Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK

Raquel Gil-Cazorla*, Miguel A. Teus, Esther Arranz-Marquez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate two different soft contact lens materials for continuous-wear bandage contact lenses after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A prospective, observer-masked study was conducted of 32 eyes of 16 consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were candidates for bilateral LASEK, myopia of ≤-6.00 diopters (D), astigmatism <-1.50 D, and bilateral best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Patients were randomly selected for a balafilcon A (PureVision; Bausch & Lomb) bandage contact lens in one eye and a poly-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-methacrylate glycerol (EquiS 60; mark'ennovy) in the fellow eye. Corneal epithelial status, conjunctival and limbal hyperemia, lens movement, contact lens debris, and the responses to a subjective comfort questionnaire were assessed postoperatively. The parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Paired Student t test and chi-square tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients who underwent LASEK to correct low to moderate myopia were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.25 D. There was no difference in conjunctival or limbal hyperemia, contact lens debris, or subjective comfort between lenses at any postoperative visit. In contrast, the corneal epithelial status was statistically better in the eyes with a silicone bandage contact lens 5 days after LASEK (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the bandage contact lens material used after LASEK affects the corneal epithelial healing process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-203
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Hydrophilic Contact Lens
Hydrogel
Contact Lenses
Silicones
Bandages
Lasers
Myopia
Hyperemia
Lenses
Astigmatism
Methacrylates
Chi-Square Distribution
Glycerol
Visual Acuity
Students

Cite this

@article{a27f2e9f5408479f935e87b828fd68ba,
title = "Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate two different soft contact lens materials for continuous-wear bandage contact lenses after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A prospective, observer-masked study was conducted of 32 eyes of 16 consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were candidates for bilateral LASEK, myopia of ≤-6.00 diopters (D), astigmatism <-1.50 D, and bilateral best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Patients were randomly selected for a balafilcon A (PureVision; Bausch & Lomb) bandage contact lens in one eye and a poly-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-methacrylate glycerol (EquiS 60; mark'ennovy) in the fellow eye. Corneal epithelial status, conjunctival and limbal hyperemia, lens movement, contact lens debris, and the responses to a subjective comfort questionnaire were assessed postoperatively. The parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Paired Student t test and chi-square tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients who underwent LASEK to correct low to moderate myopia were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.25 D. There was no difference in conjunctival or limbal hyperemia, contact lens debris, or subjective comfort between lenses at any postoperative visit. In contrast, the corneal epithelial status was statistically better in the eyes with a silicone bandage contact lens 5 days after LASEK (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the bandage contact lens material used after LASEK affects the corneal epithelial healing process.",
author = "Raquel Gil-Cazorla and Teus, {Miguel A.} and Esther Arranz-Marquez",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "199--203",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK. / Gil-Cazorla, Raquel; Teus, Miguel A.; Arranz-Marquez, Esther.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery , Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.02.2008, p. 199-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of silicone and non-silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses used as a bandage after LASEK

AU - Gil-Cazorla, Raquel

AU - Teus, Miguel A.

AU - Arranz-Marquez, Esther

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate two different soft contact lens materials for continuous-wear bandage contact lenses after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A prospective, observer-masked study was conducted of 32 eyes of 16 consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were candidates for bilateral LASEK, myopia of ≤-6.00 diopters (D), astigmatism <-1.50 D, and bilateral best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Patients were randomly selected for a balafilcon A (PureVision; Bausch & Lomb) bandage contact lens in one eye and a poly-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-methacrylate glycerol (EquiS 60; mark'ennovy) in the fellow eye. Corneal epithelial status, conjunctival and limbal hyperemia, lens movement, contact lens debris, and the responses to a subjective comfort questionnaire were assessed postoperatively. The parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Paired Student t test and chi-square tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients who underwent LASEK to correct low to moderate myopia were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.25 D. There was no difference in conjunctival or limbal hyperemia, contact lens debris, or subjective comfort between lenses at any postoperative visit. In contrast, the corneal epithelial status was statistically better in the eyes with a silicone bandage contact lens 5 days after LASEK (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the bandage contact lens material used after LASEK affects the corneal epithelial healing process.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate two different soft contact lens materials for continuous-wear bandage contact lenses after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). METHODS: A prospective, observer-masked study was conducted of 32 eyes of 16 consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were candidates for bilateral LASEK, myopia of ≤-6.00 diopters (D), astigmatism <-1.50 D, and bilateral best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Patients were randomly selected for a balafilcon A (PureVision; Bausch & Lomb) bandage contact lens in one eye and a poly-2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-methacrylate glycerol (EquiS 60; mark'ennovy) in the fellow eye. Corneal epithelial status, conjunctival and limbal hyperemia, lens movement, contact lens debris, and the responses to a subjective comfort questionnaire were assessed postoperatively. The parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Paired Student t test and chi-square tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes of 16 consecutive patients who underwent LASEK to correct low to moderate myopia were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.25 D. There was no difference in conjunctival or limbal hyperemia, contact lens debris, or subjective comfort between lenses at any postoperative visit. In contrast, the corneal epithelial status was statistically better in the eyes with a silicone bandage contact lens 5 days after LASEK (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the bandage contact lens material used after LASEK affects the corneal epithelial healing process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149145862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18297946

AN - SCOPUS:39149145862

VL - 24

SP - 199

EP - 203

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 2

ER -