Computational simulation of human perception of spatially-dependent patterns modulated by degree and angle of linear polarization

Gary Misson, Shelby E. Temple, Stephen J Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent studies on polarization perception have shown that humans are sensitive to patterned stimuli modulated by either angle of linear polarization (AoP) or degree of polarization (DoP). Here, we present a model of human polarization sensitivity that incorporates both AoP and DoP as spatially dependent input variables. Applying the model to both sinusoidal- and square-wave-modulated DoP and AoP inputs, we demonstrate the theoretical similarities and differences generated by such inputs. Our model indicates the following: (i) edge boundaries between two adjacent areas of different linear polarization are preserved for both AoP- and DoP-modulated stimuli; and (ii) compared with DoP stimuli, AoP stimuli generate greater luminance changes at the photoreceptor level, suggesting that AoP-modulated patterns are potentially more salient than DoP patterns. The computational model is supported experimentally with an optical test of the model comprising a radial diattenuating polarizing filter and modified liquid crystal displays generating DoP- and AoP-modulated outputs. Psychophysical measures of human sensitivity confirm the increased salience of AoP- relative to DoP-modulated stimuli. These findings have practical application to the selection of DoP- and AoP-modulated stimuli for the investigation of macular function and macular pigment density in healthy and diseased eyes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)B65-B70
JournalJournal of the Optical Society of America A
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

linear polarization
Polarization
polarization
stimuli
simulation
photoreceptors
square waves
luminance
pigments
liquid crystals
filters
output
sensitivity

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Optical Society of America.

Funding: Innovate UK (grant 900042).

Cite this

@article{c9f4a8fce6024b0daf8fbf12e5f234af,
title = "Computational simulation of human perception of spatially-dependent patterns modulated by degree and angle of linear polarization",
abstract = "Recent studies on polarization perception have shown that humans are sensitive to patterned stimuli modulated by either angle of linear polarization (AoP) or degree of polarization (DoP). Here, we present a model of human polarization sensitivity that incorporates both AoP and DoP as spatially dependent input variables. Applying the model to both sinusoidal- and square-wave-modulated DoP and AoP inputs, we demonstrate the theoretical similarities and differences generated by such inputs. Our model indicates the following: (i) edge boundaries between two adjacent areas of different linear polarization are preserved for both AoP- and DoP-modulated stimuli; and (ii) compared with DoP stimuli, AoP stimuli generate greater luminance changes at the photoreceptor level, suggesting that AoP-modulated patterns are potentially more salient than DoP patterns. The computational model is supported experimentally with an optical test of the model comprising a radial diattenuating polarizing filter and modified liquid crystal displays generating DoP- and AoP-modulated outputs. Psychophysical measures of human sensitivity confirm the increased salience of AoP- relative to DoP-modulated stimuli. These findings have practical application to the selection of DoP- and AoP-modulated stimuli for the investigation of macular function and macular pigment density in healthy and diseased eyes.",
author = "Gary Misson and Temple, {Shelby E.} and Anderson, {Stephen J}",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 Optical Society of America. Funding: Innovate UK (grant 900042).",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1364/JOSAA.36.000B65",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "B65--B70",
journal = "Journal of the Optical Society of America A",
issn = "1084-7529",
publisher = "OSA Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computational simulation of human perception of spatially-dependent patterns modulated by degree and angle of linear polarization

AU - Misson, Gary

AU - Temple, Shelby E.

AU - Anderson, Stephen J

N1 - © 2018 Optical Society of America. Funding: Innovate UK (grant 900042).

PY - 2019/2/22

Y1 - 2019/2/22

N2 - Recent studies on polarization perception have shown that humans are sensitive to patterned stimuli modulated by either angle of linear polarization (AoP) or degree of polarization (DoP). Here, we present a model of human polarization sensitivity that incorporates both AoP and DoP as spatially dependent input variables. Applying the model to both sinusoidal- and square-wave-modulated DoP and AoP inputs, we demonstrate the theoretical similarities and differences generated by such inputs. Our model indicates the following: (i) edge boundaries between two adjacent areas of different linear polarization are preserved for both AoP- and DoP-modulated stimuli; and (ii) compared with DoP stimuli, AoP stimuli generate greater luminance changes at the photoreceptor level, suggesting that AoP-modulated patterns are potentially more salient than DoP patterns. The computational model is supported experimentally with an optical test of the model comprising a radial diattenuating polarizing filter and modified liquid crystal displays generating DoP- and AoP-modulated outputs. Psychophysical measures of human sensitivity confirm the increased salience of AoP- relative to DoP-modulated stimuli. These findings have practical application to the selection of DoP- and AoP-modulated stimuli for the investigation of macular function and macular pigment density in healthy and diseased eyes.

AB - Recent studies on polarization perception have shown that humans are sensitive to patterned stimuli modulated by either angle of linear polarization (AoP) or degree of polarization (DoP). Here, we present a model of human polarization sensitivity that incorporates both AoP and DoP as spatially dependent input variables. Applying the model to both sinusoidal- and square-wave-modulated DoP and AoP inputs, we demonstrate the theoretical similarities and differences generated by such inputs. Our model indicates the following: (i) edge boundaries between two adjacent areas of different linear polarization are preserved for both AoP- and DoP-modulated stimuli; and (ii) compared with DoP stimuli, AoP stimuli generate greater luminance changes at the photoreceptor level, suggesting that AoP-modulated patterns are potentially more salient than DoP patterns. The computational model is supported experimentally with an optical test of the model comprising a radial diattenuating polarizing filter and modified liquid crystal displays generating DoP- and AoP-modulated outputs. Psychophysical measures of human sensitivity confirm the increased salience of AoP- relative to DoP-modulated stimuli. These findings have practical application to the selection of DoP- and AoP-modulated stimuli for the investigation of macular function and macular pigment density in healthy and diseased eyes.

UR - https://www.osapublishing.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-36-4-b65

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064134050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/JOSAA.36.000B65

DO - 10.1364/JOSAA.36.000B65

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - B65-B70

JO - Journal of the Optical Society of America A

JF - Journal of the Optical Society of America A

SN - 1084-7529

IS - 4

ER -