Abstract
An application of a novel methodology in a redesign of the load bearing subassembly of an automotive seat adjuster is presented. This novel methodology efficiently evaluated concept variations at a higher rate than the traditional approach based on FEA and therefore enables a comparison of the objective spaces rather than undesirable point design comparisons. This significant increase in efficiency increased the amount of generated knowledge that was presented to the design engineer in a form of the Pareto front comparisons. The comparisons of the Pareto fronts allowed for a clear identification of Concept #3 as the preferred solution, given the load-bearing and the light weighting criteria only. The results also indicated that Concept #2 could also be promising solution after major enhancements, as it showed potential to outperform the current solution in some cases.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Sustainable Automotive Technologies 2013 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 5th International Conference ICSAT 2013 |
| Editors | Jorg Wellnitz, Aleksandar Subic, Ramona Trufin |
| Pages | 151-160 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Oct 2013 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual Design Evaluation of Lightweight Load Bearing Structural Assembly for an Automotive Seat Adjuster Mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Citations
- 1 Edited Book
-
Sustainable Automotive Technologies 2013: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference ICSAT 2013
Wellnitz, J., Subic, A. & Trufin, R., 4 Oct 2013, 305 p. (Lecture Notes in Mobility)Research output: Book/Report › Edited Book
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver