Conspiratorial narratives as cultural repertoires and methodological tools

Ebru Soytemel, Erol Saglam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article builds on data and field work notes from two ethnographic studies conducted in two cities: Istanbul and Trabzon, Turkey. It examines the socio-political dynamics behind the prevalence and impact of conspiratorial narratives. We explore the emergence, circulation, and effects of these narratives and how they shape political orientations and mobilisation. We raise methodological questions about these narratives and propose researchers closely scrutinise them rather than dismissing them as illogical or incoherent. Our research reveals three novel relational and methodological insights derived from conspiratorial narratives. First, these narratives serve as sense-making tools during times of uncertainty. They provide accessible explanations for abrupt changes, and they rely and draw upon ‘cultural repertoires’. Second, by challenging the mainstream narratives, they shape subjectivities; empowering narrators to act as agents. Third, how conspiratorial narratives circulate has implications for the dynamics of state-public relationships, often following the neoliberal logic, they portray political leaders as central figures in navigating complex decision-making processes. Our case studies demonstrate that actors, even in less powerful positions, may not necessarily antagonise the state. We underscore the methodological significance of these narratives for researchers, to examine actors’ agency, group dynamics, and responses to everyday injustices.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
Early online date22 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • agency
  • cultural repertoires
  • ethnographic research
  • everyday politics
  • Istanbul
  • subjectivities
  • Trabzon
  • Turkey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiratorial narratives as cultural repertoires and methodological tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this