Constructing an 'efficient frontier' of accounting journal quality

Alan D. Lowe*, Joanne Locke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper reports the construction of an 'efficient frontier' of the perceived quality attributes of academic accounting journals. The analysis is based on perception data from two web-based surveys of Australasian and British academics. The research reported here contributes to the existing literature by augmenting the commonly supported single dimension of quality with an additional measure indicating the variation of perceptions of journal quality. The result of combining these factors is depicted diagrammatically in a manner that reflects the risk and return trade-off as conceptualised in the capital market model of an efficient frontier of investment opportunities. This conceptualisation of a 'market' for accounting research provides a context in which to highlight the complex issues facing academics in their roles as editors, researchers and authors. The analysis indicates that the perceptions of the so-called 'elite' US accounting journals have become unsettled particularly in Australasia, showing high levels of variability in perceived quality, while other traditionally highly ranked journals (ABR, AOS, CAR) have a more 'efficient' combination of high-quality ranking and lower dispersion of perceptions. The implications of these results for accounting academics in the context of what is often seen as a market for accounting research are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-341
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Accounting Review
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Journal quality
Accounting research
Efficient frontier
Perceived quality
Conceptualization
Investment opportunities
Elites
Market model
Trade-offs
Risk and return
Capital markets
Factors
Web-based
Quality attributes
Ranking

Keywords

  • efficient frontier
  • journal quality
  • perception study
  • risk
  • web survey

Cite this

Lowe, Alan D. ; Locke, Joanne. / Constructing an 'efficient frontier' of accounting journal quality. In: British Accounting Review. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 321-341.
@article{f72420adfd554885894a908cb30d3792,
title = "Constructing an 'efficient frontier' of accounting journal quality",
abstract = "This paper reports the construction of an 'efficient frontier' of the perceived quality attributes of academic accounting journals. The analysis is based on perception data from two web-based surveys of Australasian and British academics. The research reported here contributes to the existing literature by augmenting the commonly supported single dimension of quality with an additional measure indicating the variation of perceptions of journal quality. The result of combining these factors is depicted diagrammatically in a manner that reflects the risk and return trade-off as conceptualised in the capital market model of an efficient frontier of investment opportunities. This conceptualisation of a 'market' for accounting research provides a context in which to highlight the complex issues facing academics in their roles as editors, researchers and authors. The analysis indicates that the perceptions of the so-called 'elite' US accounting journals have become unsettled particularly in Australasia, showing high levels of variability in perceived quality, while other traditionally highly ranked journals (ABR, AOS, CAR) have a more 'efficient' combination of high-quality ranking and lower dispersion of perceptions. The implications of these results for accounting academics in the context of what is often seen as a market for accounting research are discussed. {\circledC} 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "efficient frontier, journal quality, perception study, risk, web survey",
author = "Lowe, {Alan D.} and Joanne Locke",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2006.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "321--341",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Constructing an 'efficient frontier' of accounting journal quality. / Lowe, Alan D.; Locke, Joanne.

In: British Accounting Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 321-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing an 'efficient frontier' of accounting journal quality

AU - Lowe, Alan D.

AU - Locke, Joanne

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - This paper reports the construction of an 'efficient frontier' of the perceived quality attributes of academic accounting journals. The analysis is based on perception data from two web-based surveys of Australasian and British academics. The research reported here contributes to the existing literature by augmenting the commonly supported single dimension of quality with an additional measure indicating the variation of perceptions of journal quality. The result of combining these factors is depicted diagrammatically in a manner that reflects the risk and return trade-off as conceptualised in the capital market model of an efficient frontier of investment opportunities. This conceptualisation of a 'market' for accounting research provides a context in which to highlight the complex issues facing academics in their roles as editors, researchers and authors. The analysis indicates that the perceptions of the so-called 'elite' US accounting journals have become unsettled particularly in Australasia, showing high levels of variability in perceived quality, while other traditionally highly ranked journals (ABR, AOS, CAR) have a more 'efficient' combination of high-quality ranking and lower dispersion of perceptions. The implications of these results for accounting academics in the context of what is often seen as a market for accounting research are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This paper reports the construction of an 'efficient frontier' of the perceived quality attributes of academic accounting journals. The analysis is based on perception data from two web-based surveys of Australasian and British academics. The research reported here contributes to the existing literature by augmenting the commonly supported single dimension of quality with an additional measure indicating the variation of perceptions of journal quality. The result of combining these factors is depicted diagrammatically in a manner that reflects the risk and return trade-off as conceptualised in the capital market model of an efficient frontier of investment opportunities. This conceptualisation of a 'market' for accounting research provides a context in which to highlight the complex issues facing academics in their roles as editors, researchers and authors. The analysis indicates that the perceptions of the so-called 'elite' US accounting journals have become unsettled particularly in Australasia, showing high levels of variability in perceived quality, while other traditionally highly ranked journals (ABR, AOS, CAR) have a more 'efficient' combination of high-quality ranking and lower dispersion of perceptions. The implications of these results for accounting academics in the context of what is often seen as a market for accounting research are discussed. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - efficient frontier

KW - journal quality

KW - perception study

KW - risk

KW - web survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747339747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838906000230?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2006.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2006.02.003

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 321

EP - 341

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 3

ER -