Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Contesting gender stereotypes stimulates generalized fairness in the selection of leaders

  • Carola Leicht*
  • , Georgina Randsley de Moura
  • , Richard J. Crisp
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • Coventry University
    • University of Kent
    • University of Sheffield

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    35   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)
    92 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Exposure to counter-stereotypic gender role models (e.g., a woman engineer) has been shown to successfully reduce the application of biased gender stereotypes. We tested the hypothesis that such efforts may more generally lessen the application of stereotypic knowledge in other (non-gendered) domains. Specifically, based on the notion that counter-stereotypes can stimulate a lesser reliance on heuristic thinking, we predicted that contesting gender stereotypes would eliminate a more general group prototypicality bias in the selection of leaders. Three studies supported this hypothesis. After exposing participants to a counter-stereotypic gender role model, group prototypicality no longer predicted leadership evaluation and selection. We discuss the implications of these findings for groups and organizations seeking to capitalize on the benefits of an increasingly diverse workforce.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1025-1039
    Number of pages15
    JournalLeadership Quarterly
    Volume25
    Issue number5
    Early online date8 Jun 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    Bibliographical note

    © 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Keywords

    • counter-stereotypes
    • gender role model
    • group prototypicality
    • leadership

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting gender stereotypes stimulates generalized fairness in the selection of leaders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this