Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning

Maria T. Medaglia, Franca Tecchio, Stefano Seri, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Paolo M. Rossini, Camillo Porcaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


A wide range of essential reasoning tasks rely on contradiction identification, a cornerstone of human rationality, communication and debate founded on the inversion of the logical operators "Every" and "Some." A high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) study was performed in 11 normal young adults. The cerebral network involved in the identification of contradiction included the orbito-frontal and anterior-cingulate cortices and the temporo-polar cortices. The event-related dynamic of this network showed an early negative deflection lasting 500 ms after sentence presentation. This was followed by a positive deflection lasting 1.5 s, which was different for the two logical operators. A lesser degree of network activation (either in neuron number or their level of phase locking or both) occurred while processing statements with "Some," suggesting that this was a relatively simpler scenario with one example to be figured out, instead of the many examples or the absence of a counterexample searched for while processing statements with "Every." A self-generated reward system seemed to resonate the recruited circuitry when the contradictory task is successfully completed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4187-4197
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Issue number12
Early online date24 Jun 2009
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009


  • adult
  • algorithms
  • brain
  • brain mapping
  • cognition
  • electroencephalography
  • female
  • humans
  • intelligence
  • male
  • neural pathways
  • reward
  • computer-assisted signal processing
  • contradictory reasoning
  • independent component analysis
  • logical operators


Dive into the research topics of 'Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this