Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Aston Research Explorer Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Research units
Profiles
Research Outputs
Datasets
Student theses
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Equipment
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Coronary Stent Fracture: Clinical Evidence Vs. the Testing Paradigm
Claire Conway
School of Biosciences
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary Stent Fracture: Clinical Evidence Vs. the Testing Paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Testing Paradigms
100%
Clinical Evidence
100%
Coronary Stent
100%
Stent Fracture
100%
Stent Struts
66%
Strut Fracture
66%
Model Setting
33%
Clinical Data
33%
Computational Modeling
33%
High Incidence
33%
Regulatory Guidance
33%
Experimental Testing
33%
Fatigue Life
33%
Detection Time
33%
Detector Resolution
33%
Adverse Clinical Events
33%
Regulatory Standards
33%
In-stent Restenosis
33%
Equivalent Life
33%
United States Food
33%
Vascular Stent
33%
Duration of Life
33%
Stent Thrombosis
33%
Engineering
Food and Drug Administration
100%
Review Paper
50%
United States
50%
Full Scale
50%
Clinical Data
50%
Stent Restenosis
50%
Device Manufacturer
50%
Endovascular Stent
50%
Fatigue Lifetime
50%
Nursing and Health Professions
Coronary Stent
100%
Stent Fracture
100%
Food and Drug Administration
66%
Stent
66%
Stent Thrombosis
33%
Vascular Stent
33%
In-Stent Restenosis
33%
Medicine and Dentistry
Stent Fracture
100%
Drug Administration
33%
Lifespan
33%
In-Stent Restenosis
33%
Stent Thrombosis
33%
Feeding
33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Stent Fracture
100%
Drug Administration
33%
In-Stent Restenosis
33%
Stent Thrombosis
33%