Abstract
Theoretical and empirical studies show that deindustrialisation, broadly observed in developed countries, is an inherent part of the economic development pattern. However, post-communist countries, while being only middle-income economies, have also experienced deindustrialisation. Building on the model developed by Rowthorn and Wells (1987) we explain this phenomenon and show that there is a strong negative relationship between the magnitude of deindustrialisation and the efficiency and consistency of market reforms. We also demonstrate that reforms of the agricultural sector play a significant role in placing a transition country on a development path that guarantees convergence to EU employment structures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Ann Arbor, MI (US) |
| Publisher | William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Publication series
| Name | William Davidson Institute working paper series |
|---|---|
| Publisher | William Davidson Institute |
| No. | 463 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- economic transition
- employment structures
- deindustrialisation
- liberalisation
- convergence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deindustrialisation: lessons from the structural outcomes of post-Communist transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver