Abstract
Background:
Managing food allergy (FA) entails complex lifestyle changes and development of specific coping strategies. How we cope with long-term conditions is associated with clinical and psychological outcomes and so it is important that adaptive strategies are promoted.
Objective:
To develop and establish the reliability and validity of new coping with FA scales (CoFAS) for children and young people (CYP) aged 8-16 and for parents.
Methods:
The CoFAS were developed following interviews with 32 CYP aged 8-16 years and 8 parents, a systematic review of literature and consultation with FA experts. Reliability and validity analysis was conducted on 151 CYP aged 8-16 who completed the CoFAS-C and 390 caregivers who completed the CoFAS-P. Participants also completed validation measures of generic coping, anxiety and depression, quality of life and self-efficacy.
Results:
Exploratory factor analysis resulted in four sub-scales for the CoFAS-C (Avoidance and Minimisation, Positive Beliefs, Self-Management and Social Support) and three sub-scales for the CoFAS-P (Avoidance and Minimisation, Planning and Preparation and Dealing with Emotions). All had good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach alphas = 0.74 to 0.84). and low to medium correlations with validation measures.
Conclusion:
The CoFAS are reliable and valid scales to identify coping strategies used for FA management by CYP and parents. Planning and preparation appear to be the most adaptive strategies, with avoidance and minimisation the least, but managing emotions is also important to promote. Knowledge of the types of coping strategies used by patients could direct clinical care.
Managing food allergy (FA) entails complex lifestyle changes and development of specific coping strategies. How we cope with long-term conditions is associated with clinical and psychological outcomes and so it is important that adaptive strategies are promoted.
Objective:
To develop and establish the reliability and validity of new coping with FA scales (CoFAS) for children and young people (CYP) aged 8-16 and for parents.
Methods:
The CoFAS were developed following interviews with 32 CYP aged 8-16 years and 8 parents, a systematic review of literature and consultation with FA experts. Reliability and validity analysis was conducted on 151 CYP aged 8-16 who completed the CoFAS-C and 390 caregivers who completed the CoFAS-P. Participants also completed validation measures of generic coping, anxiety and depression, quality of life and self-efficacy.
Results:
Exploratory factor analysis resulted in four sub-scales for the CoFAS-C (Avoidance and Minimisation, Positive Beliefs, Self-Management and Social Support) and three sub-scales for the CoFAS-P (Avoidance and Minimisation, Planning and Preparation and Dealing with Emotions). All had good to excellent internal reliability (Cronbach alphas = 0.74 to 0.84). and low to medium correlations with validation measures.
Conclusion:
The CoFAS are reliable and valid scales to identify coping strategies used for FA management by CYP and parents. Planning and preparation appear to be the most adaptive strategies, with avoidance and minimisation the least, but managing emotions is also important to promote. Knowledge of the types of coping strategies used by patients could direct clinical care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1165-1174.e9 |
| Journal | Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 9 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2026 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Funding
This study was part funded by a PhD studentship from Allergy UK. Conflicts of interest: R. C. Knibb reports research funding from the National Institute for Health Research, Aimmune, National Peanut Board, Novartis, and the Food Standards Agency; honoraria from Nutricia, Viatris, Stallergenes Greer, and DBV Technologies; and being Chair of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology Psychology Special Interest Group. The rest of the authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.
| Funders |
|---|
| National Peanut Board |
| Allergy UK |
| National Institute for Health and Care Research |
| Food Standards Agency |
| British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology Psychology Special Interest Group |
| Novartis |
Keywords
- Food allergy
- allergy
- caregivers
- coping
- children
- adolescents
- paediatrics
- scale
- scale development
- health psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of the Coping with Food Allergy Scales (CoFAS) for Children and Young People and Parents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver