TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in Practitioner Experience, Practice Type, and Profession in Attitudes Toward Growing Contact Lens Practice
AU - Thite, Nilesh
AU - Desiato, Alfredo
AU - Shinde, Lakshmi
AU - Wolffsohm, James S
AU - Naroo, Shehzad A
AU - Santodomingo Rubido, Jacinto
AU - Cho, Pauline
AU - Jones, Debbie
AU - Villa-Collar, Cesar
AU - Carrillo, Guillermo
AU - Chan, Osbert
AU - Wang, Haiying
AU - Iomdina, Elena
AU - Tarutta, Elena
AU - Proskurina, Olga
AU - Fan, Chi Shing
AU - Zeri, Fabrizio
AU - Bakkar, May M
AU - Barodawala, Fakhruddin
AU - Dabral, Neeraj
AU - Lafosse, Edouard
AU - Lee, Cheni
AU - Nichols, Jason
AU - Chan, Jack
AU - Park, Kyounghee
AU - Nair, Vishakh
AU - van der Worp, Eef
AU - Vankudre, Gopi
AU - Maseedupally, Vinod
AU - Bhattarai, Yashaswee
AU - Nagzarkar, Dimple
AU - Brauer, Peter
AU - Gil-Cazorla, Raquel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate eye care practitioners' attitudes and perceptions toward potential interventions that can enhance contact lens (CL) practice across the world, and how this is influenced by their practice setting. METHODS: A self-administered, anonymized survey was constructed in English and then forward and backward translated into six more languages. The survey was distributed online via social media platforms and mailing lists involving reputed international professional bodies. RESULTS: In total, 2,222 responses from 27 countries with sufficient responses were analyzed (53% females, median age- 37 years). Most of the respondents were optometrists (81.9%) and 47.6% were from stand-alone/independent practices. Median working experience in CL prescribing was 11.0 years (IQR: 18.0, 4-22 years). Over two-third of them declared themselves to be very hopeful (22.9%) or hopeful (45.1%) about the future of their CL practice. Among the potential interventions proposed, continuous update of knowledge and skills and competently managing CL-related complications were rated the most important (median score: 9/10 for each). Practitioners working in national/regional retail chains expressed higher proactivity in recommending CLs (9/10) than those in local chains, hospitals, and universities (for all 8/10, P <0.05). National differences were also identified in eye care practitioner attitudes and perceptions ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study provided important information to delineate a variety of elements characterizing CL practice across the world. These insights can serve as a basis to design strategies at national and international levels.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate eye care practitioners' attitudes and perceptions toward potential interventions that can enhance contact lens (CL) practice across the world, and how this is influenced by their practice setting. METHODS: A self-administered, anonymized survey was constructed in English and then forward and backward translated into six more languages. The survey was distributed online via social media platforms and mailing lists involving reputed international professional bodies. RESULTS: In total, 2,222 responses from 27 countries with sufficient responses were analyzed (53% females, median age- 37 years). Most of the respondents were optometrists (81.9%) and 47.6% were from stand-alone/independent practices. Median working experience in CL prescribing was 11.0 years (IQR: 18.0, 4-22 years). Over two-third of them declared themselves to be very hopeful (22.9%) or hopeful (45.1%) about the future of their CL practice. Among the potential interventions proposed, continuous update of knowledge and skills and competently managing CL-related complications were rated the most important (median score: 9/10 for each). Practitioners working in national/regional retail chains expressed higher proactivity in recommending CLs (9/10) than those in local chains, hospitals, and universities (for all 8/10, P <0.05). National differences were also identified in eye care practitioner attitudes and perceptions ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study provided important information to delineate a variety of elements characterizing CL practice across the world. These insights can serve as a basis to design strategies at national and international levels.
KW - Contact Lenses
KW - Humans
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Universities
KW - Male
KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
KW - Female
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137125829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000920
DO - 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000920
M3 - Article
C2 - 35971228
SN - 1542-2321
VL - 48
SP - 369
EP - 376
JO - Eye and Contact Lens
JF - Eye and Contact Lens
IS - 9
ER -