Directing under disqualification: leave to act

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reviews the procedures by which a disqualified director can continue to act. Views this siutation through two recent cases. Highlights that courts should not fetter the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s 17 discretion and reject the approach of earlier cases that in order for leave to be granted, a need on the part of the director or company was a prerequisite.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1575-1576
Number of pages2
JournalNew Law Journal
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2003

Keywords

  • disqualified director
  • Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

Cite this

@article{d31ade9b67474174b75b5179ec706759,
title = "Directing under disqualification: leave to act",
abstract = "Reviews the procedures by which a disqualified director can continue to act. Views this siutation through two recent cases. Highlights that courts should not fetter the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s 17 discretion and reject the approach of earlier cases that in order for leave to be granted, a need on the part of the director or company was a prerequisite.",
keywords = "disqualified director, Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986",
author = "Goddard, {Robert J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "24",
language = "English",
pages = "1575--1576",
journal = "New Law Journal",
issn = "0306-6479",
publisher = "Butterworths Tolley",

}

Directing under disqualification : leave to act. / Goddard, Robert J.

In: New Law Journal, 24.10.2003, p. 1575-1576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Directing under disqualification

T2 - leave to act

AU - Goddard, Robert J.

PY - 2003/10/24

Y1 - 2003/10/24

N2 - Reviews the procedures by which a disqualified director can continue to act. Views this siutation through two recent cases. Highlights that courts should not fetter the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s 17 discretion and reject the approach of earlier cases that in order for leave to be granted, a need on the part of the director or company was a prerequisite.

AB - Reviews the procedures by which a disqualified director can continue to act. Views this siutation through two recent cases. Highlights that courts should not fetter the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s 17 discretion and reject the approach of earlier cases that in order for leave to be granted, a need on the part of the director or company was a prerequisite.

KW - disqualified director

KW - Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

M3 - Article

SP - 1575

EP - 1576

JO - New Law Journal

JF - New Law Journal

SN - 0306-6479

ER -