Abstract
Reviews the procedures by which a disqualified director can continue to act. Views this siutation through two recent cases. Highlights that courts should not fetter the
Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s 17 discretion and reject the approach of earlier cases that in order for leave to be granted, a need on the part of the director or company was a prerequisite.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1575-1576 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | New Law Journal |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Oct 2003 |
Keywords
- disqualified director
- Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986