Discourses of friendship between heterosexual women and gay men

mythical norms and an absence of desire

Dan Shepperd, Adrian Coyle, Peter Hegarty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gay men and heterosexual women may share some common interests in critiquing hetero-patriarchy. However feminism and gay liberationist politics do not always coincide and the role of individual subjectivities in recognising oppressive discourses of normativity remains debated. Interviews were conducted with seven friendship dyads of heterosexual women and gay men. Transcripts were subjected to discourse analysis, which suggested extensive management of heterosexist norms in the friends' accounts of friendship. The analysis highlighted ambiguity over the 'male' status of gay men, a concern with constructing the friendships as legitimately asexual, and the use of parody in the face of homophobia to disrupt normative assumptions. Although we primarily considered the role of heterosexist discourses, there is also evidence that other dimensions of non-normativity (for example, gender and ethnicity) are implicated in friendships constructed around shared otherness and mutual non-normativity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-224
Number of pages20
JournalFeminism and Psychology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Heterosexuality
friendship
discourse
normativity
Homophobia
Feminism
patriarchy
satire
foreignness
dyad
feminism
discourse analysis
subjectivity
Politics
ethnicity
politics
Sexual Minorities
Friendship
Discourse
Gay Men

Bibliographical note

© 2010 SAGE

Keywords

  • discourse analysis
  • feminism
  • friendship
  • gender
  • normativity
  • queer theory

Cite this

@article{1a14fddf901d45f0bbace32ea1071773,
title = "Discourses of friendship between heterosexual women and gay men: mythical norms and an absence of desire",
abstract = "Gay men and heterosexual women may share some common interests in critiquing hetero-patriarchy. However feminism and gay liberationist politics do not always coincide and the role of individual subjectivities in recognising oppressive discourses of normativity remains debated. Interviews were conducted with seven friendship dyads of heterosexual women and gay men. Transcripts were subjected to discourse analysis, which suggested extensive management of heterosexist norms in the friends' accounts of friendship. The analysis highlighted ambiguity over the 'male' status of gay men, a concern with constructing the friendships as legitimately asexual, and the use of parody in the face of homophobia to disrupt normative assumptions. Although we primarily considered the role of heterosexist discourses, there is also evidence that other dimensions of non-normativity (for example, gender and ethnicity) are implicated in friendships constructed around shared otherness and mutual non-normativity.",
keywords = "discourse analysis, feminism, friendship, gender, normativity, queer theory",
author = "Dan Shepperd and Adrian Coyle and Peter Hegarty",
note = "{\circledC} 2010 SAGE",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0959353509349604",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "205--224",
journal = "Feminism and Psychology",
issn = "0959-3535",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "2",

}

Discourses of friendship between heterosexual women and gay men : mythical norms and an absence of desire. / Shepperd, Dan; Coyle, Adrian; Hegarty, Peter.

In: Feminism and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 205-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourses of friendship between heterosexual women and gay men

T2 - mythical norms and an absence of desire

AU - Shepperd, Dan

AU - Coyle, Adrian

AU - Hegarty, Peter

N1 - © 2010 SAGE

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Gay men and heterosexual women may share some common interests in critiquing hetero-patriarchy. However feminism and gay liberationist politics do not always coincide and the role of individual subjectivities in recognising oppressive discourses of normativity remains debated. Interviews were conducted with seven friendship dyads of heterosexual women and gay men. Transcripts were subjected to discourse analysis, which suggested extensive management of heterosexist norms in the friends' accounts of friendship. The analysis highlighted ambiguity over the 'male' status of gay men, a concern with constructing the friendships as legitimately asexual, and the use of parody in the face of homophobia to disrupt normative assumptions. Although we primarily considered the role of heterosexist discourses, there is also evidence that other dimensions of non-normativity (for example, gender and ethnicity) are implicated in friendships constructed around shared otherness and mutual non-normativity.

AB - Gay men and heterosexual women may share some common interests in critiquing hetero-patriarchy. However feminism and gay liberationist politics do not always coincide and the role of individual subjectivities in recognising oppressive discourses of normativity remains debated. Interviews were conducted with seven friendship dyads of heterosexual women and gay men. Transcripts were subjected to discourse analysis, which suggested extensive management of heterosexist norms in the friends' accounts of friendship. The analysis highlighted ambiguity over the 'male' status of gay men, a concern with constructing the friendships as legitimately asexual, and the use of parody in the face of homophobia to disrupt normative assumptions. Although we primarily considered the role of heterosexist discourses, there is also evidence that other dimensions of non-normativity (for example, gender and ethnicity) are implicated in friendships constructed around shared otherness and mutual non-normativity.

KW - discourse analysis

KW - feminism

KW - friendship

KW - gender

KW - normativity

KW - queer theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952815103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://fap.sagepub.com/content/20/2/205

U2 - 10.1177/0959353509349604

DO - 10.1177/0959353509349604

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 205

EP - 224

JO - Feminism and Psychology

JF - Feminism and Psychology

SN - 0959-3535

IS - 2

ER -