Disease status in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Inter-centre comparative analysis and correlates

Y. A. Rajabally*, J. Cassereau, A. Robbe, G. Nicolas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) may have variable evolution profiles, which have not been compared between cohorts. The relationship of disease status with motor strength, function and electrophysiology is uncertain. Methods: Disease status was studied with a simplified proposed scale in two patient cohorts totalling 72 subjects from Leicester, UK, and Angers, France. Clinical and electrophysiological records were analysed. Results: Independent ascertainment of disease status in each cohort revealed similar rates of remission (P = 0.23), stable/improving disease (P = 0.34) and unstable/active disease (P = 1). No correlation was ascertained with strength or function. Median nerve compound muscle action potential was the only independent electrophysiological predictor of disease status ascertained (P = 0.046). Conclusions: Disease status distribution may represent an important comparative indicator for management of CIDP cohorts and could be useful for benchmarking service and treatment provision. Degree of upper limb motor axonal loss may represent a useful electrophysiological marker of disease status in CIDP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1469-1473
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Neurology
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 European Academy of Neurology.

Keywords

  • Axonal
  • Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
  • Disease activity status
  • Neuropathy
  • Treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disease status in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Inter-centre comparative analysis and correlates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this