Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult

Vicki Anderson, Megan Spencer-Smith, Amanda Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Plasticity is an intrinsic property of the central nervous system, reflecting its capacity to respond in a dynamic manner to the environment and experience via modification of neural circuitry. In the context of healthy development, plasticity is considered beneficial, facilitating adaptive change in response to environmental stimuli and enrichment, with research documenting establishment of new neural connections and modification to the mapping between neural activity and behaviour. Less is known about the impact of this plasticity in the context of the young, injured brain. This review seeks to explore plasticity processes in the context of early brain insult, taking into account historical perspectives and building on recent advances in knowledge regarding ongoing development and recovery following early brain insult, with a major emphasis on neurobehavioural domains. We were particularly interested to explore the way in which plasticity processes respond to early brain insult, the implications for functional recovery and how this literature contributes to the debate between localization of brain function and neural network models. To this end we have provided an overview of normal brain development, followed by a description of the biological mechanisms associated with the most common childhood brain insults, in order to explore an evidence base for considering the competing theoretical perspectives of early plasticity and early vulnerability. We then detail these theories and the way in which they contribute to our understanding of the consequences of early brain insult. Finally, we examine evidence that considers key factors (e.g. insult severity, age at insult, environment) that may act, either independently or synergistically, to influence recovery processes and ultimate outcome. We conclude that neither plasticity nor vulnerability theories are able to explain the range of functional outcomes from early brain insult. Rather, they represent extremes along a ‘recovery continuum’. Where a child’s outcome falls along this continuum depends on injury factors (severity, nature, age) and environmental influences (family, sociodemographic factors, interventions).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2197-2221
Number of pages25
JournalBrain Research
Volume134
Issue number8
Early online date22 Jul 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Brain
Neural Networks (Computer)
Central Nervous System
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • brain injury
  • plasticity
  • neurobehaviour
  • child
  • recovery

Cite this

Anderson, Vicki ; Spencer-Smith, Megan ; Wood, Amanda. / Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. In: Brain Research. 2011 ; Vol. 134, No. 8. pp. 2197-2221.
@article{9d8954ba1de54faf8f41773b250503c3,
title = "Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult",
abstract = "Plasticity is an intrinsic property of the central nervous system, reflecting its capacity to respond in a dynamic manner to the environment and experience via modification of neural circuitry. In the context of healthy development, plasticity is considered beneficial, facilitating adaptive change in response to environmental stimuli and enrichment, with research documenting establishment of new neural connections and modification to the mapping between neural activity and behaviour. Less is known about the impact of this plasticity in the context of the young, injured brain. This review seeks to explore plasticity processes in the context of early brain insult, taking into account historical perspectives and building on recent advances in knowledge regarding ongoing development and recovery following early brain insult, with a major emphasis on neurobehavioural domains. We were particularly interested to explore the way in which plasticity processes respond to early brain insult, the implications for functional recovery and how this literature contributes to the debate between localization of brain function and neural network models. To this end we have provided an overview of normal brain development, followed by a description of the biological mechanisms associated with the most common childhood brain insults, in order to explore an evidence base for considering the competing theoretical perspectives of early plasticity and early vulnerability. We then detail these theories and the way in which they contribute to our understanding of the consequences of early brain insult. Finally, we examine evidence that considers key factors (e.g. insult severity, age at insult, environment) that may act, either independently or synergistically, to influence recovery processes and ultimate outcome. We conclude that neither plasticity nor vulnerability theories are able to explain the range of functional outcomes from early brain insult. Rather, they represent extremes along a ‘recovery continuum’. Where a child’s outcome falls along this continuum depends on injury factors (severity, nature, age) and environmental influences (family, sociodemographic factors, interventions).",
keywords = "brain injury, plasticity, neurobehaviour, child, recovery",
author = "Vicki Anderson and Megan Spencer-Smith and Amanda Wood",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1093/brain/awr103",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "2197--2221",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. / Anderson, Vicki; Spencer-Smith, Megan; Wood, Amanda.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 134, No. 8, 08.2011, p. 2197-2221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult

AU - Anderson, Vicki

AU - Spencer-Smith, Megan

AU - Wood, Amanda

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Plasticity is an intrinsic property of the central nervous system, reflecting its capacity to respond in a dynamic manner to the environment and experience via modification of neural circuitry. In the context of healthy development, plasticity is considered beneficial, facilitating adaptive change in response to environmental stimuli and enrichment, with research documenting establishment of new neural connections and modification to the mapping between neural activity and behaviour. Less is known about the impact of this plasticity in the context of the young, injured brain. This review seeks to explore plasticity processes in the context of early brain insult, taking into account historical perspectives and building on recent advances in knowledge regarding ongoing development and recovery following early brain insult, with a major emphasis on neurobehavioural domains. We were particularly interested to explore the way in which plasticity processes respond to early brain insult, the implications for functional recovery and how this literature contributes to the debate between localization of brain function and neural network models. To this end we have provided an overview of normal brain development, followed by a description of the biological mechanisms associated with the most common childhood brain insults, in order to explore an evidence base for considering the competing theoretical perspectives of early plasticity and early vulnerability. We then detail these theories and the way in which they contribute to our understanding of the consequences of early brain insult. Finally, we examine evidence that considers key factors (e.g. insult severity, age at insult, environment) that may act, either independently or synergistically, to influence recovery processes and ultimate outcome. We conclude that neither plasticity nor vulnerability theories are able to explain the range of functional outcomes from early brain insult. Rather, they represent extremes along a ‘recovery continuum’. Where a child’s outcome falls along this continuum depends on injury factors (severity, nature, age) and environmental influences (family, sociodemographic factors, interventions).

AB - Plasticity is an intrinsic property of the central nervous system, reflecting its capacity to respond in a dynamic manner to the environment and experience via modification of neural circuitry. In the context of healthy development, plasticity is considered beneficial, facilitating adaptive change in response to environmental stimuli and enrichment, with research documenting establishment of new neural connections and modification to the mapping between neural activity and behaviour. Less is known about the impact of this plasticity in the context of the young, injured brain. This review seeks to explore plasticity processes in the context of early brain insult, taking into account historical perspectives and building on recent advances in knowledge regarding ongoing development and recovery following early brain insult, with a major emphasis on neurobehavioural domains. We were particularly interested to explore the way in which plasticity processes respond to early brain insult, the implications for functional recovery and how this literature contributes to the debate between localization of brain function and neural network models. To this end we have provided an overview of normal brain development, followed by a description of the biological mechanisms associated with the most common childhood brain insults, in order to explore an evidence base for considering the competing theoretical perspectives of early plasticity and early vulnerability. We then detail these theories and the way in which they contribute to our understanding of the consequences of early brain insult. Finally, we examine evidence that considers key factors (e.g. insult severity, age at insult, environment) that may act, either independently or synergistically, to influence recovery processes and ultimate outcome. We conclude that neither plasticity nor vulnerability theories are able to explain the range of functional outcomes from early brain insult. Rather, they represent extremes along a ‘recovery continuum’. Where a child’s outcome falls along this continuum depends on injury factors (severity, nature, age) and environmental influences (family, sociodemographic factors, interventions).

KW - brain injury

KW - plasticity

KW - neurobehaviour

KW - child

KW - recovery

UR - https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/brain/awr103

U2 - 10.1093/brain/awr103

DO - 10.1093/brain/awr103

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 2197

EP - 2221

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 8

ER -