Do Perverted Justice chat logs contain examples of Overt Persuasion and Sexual Extortion?: A research note responding to Chiang and Grant 2017 and 2018.

Daniela Schneevogt, Emily Chiang, Timothy D Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Studies by Chiang and Grant (2017, 2018) on the rhetorical moves of online child sexual abusers suggest that interactions between offenders and adults posing as children differ in various ways from those between offenders and genuine child victims. They point specifically to the use by one offender of moves identified as Overt persuasion and Extortion in his interactions with real children noting that these were absent from data featuring adults posing as children. The current study in-vestigates whether these more coercive and forceful moves are in fact absent in sexualised inter-actions between offenders and adult decoys by applying corpus linguistic techniques to a corpus of 622 chat logs. It is shown that overtly persuasive language is rare in the texts, and that no extortion occurred. This finding support’s Chiang and Grant’s claim and their assertion that data featuring adult decoys is not truly representative of interactions between child victims and their abusers.
LanguageEnglish
Pages97-102
JournalLanguage and Law/Linguagem e Direito
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

extortion
chat
persuasion
grant
justice
offender
interaction
linguistics
language

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)

Keywords

  • Child abuse, CSE, CSEA, grooming, sexual abuse, CMC, computer-mediated communication, IRC, moves.

Cite this

@article{94f72422732e45e38604b504c8dd92a4,
title = "Do Perverted Justice chat logs contain examples of Overt Persuasion and Sexual Extortion?: A research note responding to Chiang and Grant 2017 and 2018.",
abstract = "Studies by Chiang and Grant (2017, 2018) on the rhetorical moves of online child sexual abusers suggest that interactions between offenders and adults posing as children differ in various ways from those between offenders and genuine child victims. They point specifically to the use by one offender of moves identified as Overt persuasion and Extortion in his interactions with real children noting that these were absent from data featuring adults posing as children. The current study in-vestigates whether these more coercive and forceful moves are in fact absent in sexualised inter-actions between offenders and adult decoys by applying corpus linguistic techniques to a corpus of 622 chat logs. It is shown that overtly persuasive language is rare in the texts, and that no extortion occurred. This finding support’s Chiang and Grant’s claim and their assertion that data featuring adult decoys is not truly representative of interactions between child victims and their abusers.",
keywords = "Child abuse, CSE, CSEA, grooming, sexual abuse, CMC, computer-mediated communication, IRC, moves.",
author = "Daniela Schneevogt and Emily Chiang and Grant, {Timothy D}",
note = "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "97--102",
journal = "Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito",
issn = "2183-3745",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Perverted Justice chat logs contain examples of Overt Persuasion and Sexual Extortion?

T2 - Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito

AU - Schneevogt, Daniela

AU - Chiang, Emily

AU - Grant, Timothy D

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Studies by Chiang and Grant (2017, 2018) on the rhetorical moves of online child sexual abusers suggest that interactions between offenders and adults posing as children differ in various ways from those between offenders and genuine child victims. They point specifically to the use by one offender of moves identified as Overt persuasion and Extortion in his interactions with real children noting that these were absent from data featuring adults posing as children. The current study in-vestigates whether these more coercive and forceful moves are in fact absent in sexualised inter-actions between offenders and adult decoys by applying corpus linguistic techniques to a corpus of 622 chat logs. It is shown that overtly persuasive language is rare in the texts, and that no extortion occurred. This finding support’s Chiang and Grant’s claim and their assertion that data featuring adult decoys is not truly representative of interactions between child victims and their abusers.

AB - Studies by Chiang and Grant (2017, 2018) on the rhetorical moves of online child sexual abusers suggest that interactions between offenders and adults posing as children differ in various ways from those between offenders and genuine child victims. They point specifically to the use by one offender of moves identified as Overt persuasion and Extortion in his interactions with real children noting that these were absent from data featuring adults posing as children. The current study in-vestigates whether these more coercive and forceful moves are in fact absent in sexualised inter-actions between offenders and adult decoys by applying corpus linguistic techniques to a corpus of 622 chat logs. It is shown that overtly persuasive language is rare in the texts, and that no extortion occurred. This finding support’s Chiang and Grant’s claim and their assertion that data featuring adult decoys is not truly representative of interactions between child victims and their abusers.

KW - Child abuse, CSE, CSEA, grooming, sexual abuse, CMC, computer-mediated communication, IRC, moves.

UR - http://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/4549

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito

JF - Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito

SN - 2183-3745

IS - 1

ER -