TY - JOUR
T1 - Doctoral Apprenticeships and the “ladder of opportunity”
AU - Senior, Rowena
AU - Cleaver, Elizabeth
AU - Queiros, Gilmar
AU - King, Helen
AU - Barnett, Kirstin
PY - 2020/5/26
Y1 - 2020/5/26
N2 - Purpose: This discussion paper supports the new development of Apprenticeships at Level 8 of the UK’s Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (QAA, 2014). This exciting development, one that employers and universities had been waiting for paves the way for, apprenticeships, sold as the ladder of opportunity, to go all the way to the top. Design/methodology/approach: Here, we explore in brief the emergence of the new apprenticeship landscape and the importance of the addition of this new highest of levels. Findings: Importantly, however, we make the case that such progress needs to be met with an equally progressive approach to the design of the new doctoral pathway. Research limitations/implications: We sketch out a possible shell for the assessment of a Doctoral Apprenticeship, one that allows for flexible occupationally relevant inputs to create an applicable role-based and academically rigourous whole. Originality/value: The importance of such a design is discussed within the context of the potential for impact in three priority areas: social justice, broadening the talent pool and ensuring the relevance and sustainability of the doctoral award.
AB - Purpose: This discussion paper supports the new development of Apprenticeships at Level 8 of the UK’s Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (QAA, 2014). This exciting development, one that employers and universities had been waiting for paves the way for, apprenticeships, sold as the ladder of opportunity, to go all the way to the top. Design/methodology/approach: Here, we explore in brief the emergence of the new apprenticeship landscape and the importance of the addition of this new highest of levels. Findings: Importantly, however, we make the case that such progress needs to be met with an equally progressive approach to the design of the new doctoral pathway. Research limitations/implications: We sketch out a possible shell for the assessment of a Doctoral Apprenticeship, one that allows for flexible occupationally relevant inputs to create an applicable role-based and academically rigourous whole. Originality/value: The importance of such a design is discussed within the context of the potential for impact in three priority areas: social justice, broadening the talent pool and ensuring the relevance and sustainability of the doctoral award.
KW - Apprenticeship
KW - Doctoral study
KW - Postgraduate research
KW - Professional doctorate
KW - Widening participation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085289765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2019-0170/full/html
U2 - 10.1108/HESWBL-12-2019-0170
DO - 10.1108/HESWBL-12-2019-0170
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085289765
SN - 2042-3896
VL - 10
SP - 673
EP - 685
JO - Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning
JF - Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning
IS - 4
ER -