Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of Percutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Adults with Post-COVID Fatigue (PAuSing-pCF): Results of a Randomised, Sham-Controlled Trial

  • Marzieh Shahmandi
  • , Svetlana Cherlin
  • , Maria Germann
  • , Natalie J. Maffitt
  • , Olivia A. Burton
  • , Amn Ashhad
  • , Anne M. E. Baker
  • , Norman Charlton
  • , Aidan S. Baker
  • , Boubker Zaaimi
  • , Wan-Fai Ng
  • , Demetris S. Soteropoulos
  • , Stuart N. Baker
  • , James M.S. Wason
  • , Mark R. Baker
  • Newcastle University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background - Post-COVID fatigue (pCF) affects 2.3% of the UK population and causes physical and mental fatigue, impacting daily life. Management is largely adapted from chronic fatigue syndrome, with limited evidence in post-COVID populations. Fatigue in pCF is linked to dysfunction in central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems, suggesting a role for vagus nerve dysfunction. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive, home-based intervention, but its effectiveness in pCF remains unclear.

Methods - PAuSing-pCF was a single-site, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial in adults with pCF. Participants were assigned to active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), sham tragus, or active pinna stimulation for 8 weeks, then all crossed over to taVNS for another 8 weeks. The primary outcome was change in Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale (F-VAS) at 8 weeks. Analyses used an intention-to-treat basis, applying regression and mixed-effects models, with additional complier average causal effect (CACE) analyses. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported questionnaires and neurophysiological measures from wearable devices.

Results - Of 114 participants (taVNS n = 39; sham n = 36; placebo n = 39), 90 completed the trial. Fatigue decreased over time across all groups. At 8 weeks, F-VAS change did not differ between taVNS and controls (sham vs taVNS: 2.76, 95% CI −5 to 11, p = 0.50; placebo vs taVNS: 2.05, 95% CI −6 to 10, p = 0.62), with similar results in CACE analyses. In the taVNS group, regression analyses showed associations between fatigue and baseline neurophysiological measures at 16 weeks, but not 8 weeks. Extending taVNS to 16 weeks yielded no further improvement. Among secondary outcomes, only the fatigue impact scale score showed a significant effect at 8 weeks, with higher fatigue in placebo than taVNS.

Conclusions - Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation did not significantly improve fatigue at 8 weeks compared to sham or placebo. Further research is needed to clarify mechanisms and identify subgroups who may benefit from neuromodulation in pCF.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalNIHR Open Research
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 May 2026

Funding

This work is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [COV-LT2-022]. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Keywords

  • Vague nerve stimulation
  • fatigue
  • post-COVID
  • dysautonomia
  • statistical analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Percutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation on Fatigue in Adults with Post-COVID Fatigue (PAuSing-pCF): Results of a Randomised, Sham-Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this