Effective leadership in salient groups: revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership

Michael A. Hogg, Robin Martin, Olga Epitropaki, Aditi Mankad, Alicia Svensson, Karen Weeden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two studies compared leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and the social identity theory of leadership. Study 1 surveyed 439 employees of organizations in Wales, measuring work group salience, leader-member relations, and perceived leadership effectiveness. Study 2 surveyed 128 members of organizations in India, measuring identification not salience and also individualism/collectivism. Both studies provided good support for social identity predictions. Depersonalized leader-member relations were associated with greater leadership effectiveness among high-than low-salient groups (Study 1) and among high than low identifiers (Study 2). Personalized leadership effectiveness was less affected by salience (Study 1) and unaffected by identification (Study 2). Low-salience groups preferred personalized leadership more than did high-salience groups (Study 1). Low identifiers showed no preference but high identifiers preferred depersonalized leadership (Study 2). In Study 2, collectivists did not prefer depersonalized as opposed to personalized leadership, whereas individualists did, probably because collectivists focus more on the relational self.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1004
Number of pages14
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Ego
Wales
Social Theory
India

Keywords

  • leadership
  • social identity
  • LMX
  • group processes
  • self

Cite this

Hogg, Michael A. ; Martin, Robin ; Epitropaki, Olga ; Mankad, Aditi ; Svensson, Alicia ; Weeden, Karen. / Effective leadership in salient groups : revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 991-1004.
@article{783f83fa2e96402281f1da3029a34de8,
title = "Effective leadership in salient groups: revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership",
abstract = "Two studies compared leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and the social identity theory of leadership. Study 1 surveyed 439 employees of organizations in Wales, measuring work group salience, leader-member relations, and perceived leadership effectiveness. Study 2 surveyed 128 members of organizations in India, measuring identification not salience and also individualism/collectivism. Both studies provided good support for social identity predictions. Depersonalized leader-member relations were associated with greater leadership effectiveness among high-than low-salient groups (Study 1) and among high than low identifiers (Study 2). Personalized leadership effectiveness was less affected by salience (Study 1) and unaffected by identification (Study 2). Low-salience groups preferred personalized leadership more than did high-salience groups (Study 1). Low identifiers showed no preference but high identifiers preferred depersonalized leadership (Study 2). In Study 2, collectivists did not prefer depersonalized as opposed to personalized leadership, whereas individualists did, probably because collectivists focus more on the relational self.",
keywords = "leadership, social identity, LMX, group processes, self",
author = "Hogg, {Michael A.} and Robin Martin and Olga Epitropaki and Aditi Mankad and Alicia Svensson and Karen Weeden",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/0146167204273098",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "991--1004",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "7",

}

Effective leadership in salient groups : revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership. / Hogg, Michael A.; Martin, Robin; Epitropaki, Olga; Mankad, Aditi; Svensson, Alicia; Weeden, Karen.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 7, 07.2005, p. 991-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effective leadership in salient groups

T2 - revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of the social identity theory of leadership

AU - Hogg, Michael A.

AU - Martin, Robin

AU - Epitropaki, Olga

AU - Mankad, Aditi

AU - Svensson, Alicia

AU - Weeden, Karen

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Two studies compared leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and the social identity theory of leadership. Study 1 surveyed 439 employees of organizations in Wales, measuring work group salience, leader-member relations, and perceived leadership effectiveness. Study 2 surveyed 128 members of organizations in India, measuring identification not salience and also individualism/collectivism. Both studies provided good support for social identity predictions. Depersonalized leader-member relations were associated with greater leadership effectiveness among high-than low-salient groups (Study 1) and among high than low identifiers (Study 2). Personalized leadership effectiveness was less affected by salience (Study 1) and unaffected by identification (Study 2). Low-salience groups preferred personalized leadership more than did high-salience groups (Study 1). Low identifiers showed no preference but high identifiers preferred depersonalized leadership (Study 2). In Study 2, collectivists did not prefer depersonalized as opposed to personalized leadership, whereas individualists did, probably because collectivists focus more on the relational self.

AB - Two studies compared leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and the social identity theory of leadership. Study 1 surveyed 439 employees of organizations in Wales, measuring work group salience, leader-member relations, and perceived leadership effectiveness. Study 2 surveyed 128 members of organizations in India, measuring identification not salience and also individualism/collectivism. Both studies provided good support for social identity predictions. Depersonalized leader-member relations were associated with greater leadership effectiveness among high-than low-salient groups (Study 1) and among high than low identifiers (Study 2). Personalized leadership effectiveness was less affected by salience (Study 1) and unaffected by identification (Study 2). Low-salience groups preferred personalized leadership more than did high-salience groups (Study 1). Low identifiers showed no preference but high identifiers preferred depersonalized leadership (Study 2). In Study 2, collectivists did not prefer depersonalized as opposed to personalized leadership, whereas individualists did, probably because collectivists focus more on the relational self.

KW - leadership

KW - social identity

KW - LMX

KW - group processes

KW - self

UR - http://psp.sagepub.com/content/31/7/991

U2 - 10.1177/0146167204273098

DO - 10.1177/0146167204273098

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 991

EP - 1004

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 7

ER -