Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas

Christopher Wilson, Michael Brown, Peter Lennox

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

This chapter explores the distinctive and often contrasting educational approaches associated with engineering and musical disciplines. Both inherently
'practical' subjects with a rich body of underlying 'technical' knowledge and
rich historical heritage, convention nevertheless determines often highly contrasting educational approaches to their study and fundamentally different
conceptions of subject identity. Acknowledging a shared focus on the value
of creativity, this chapter interrogates the notional differences in pedagogy
between the two disciplines—their subject traditions—and considers the extent
to which particular experiences of subject consequently inform future
behavioural attitudes and the realization of creative potential. Exploring how
music and engineering reflect very different schemas, the chapter considers
how cross-fertilization between subjects might frame different conceptions of
creativity and inform alternative educational strategies. Noting, for example,
the concept of 'proactive interference' and the potential for cognitive inflexibility
through mastery and expertise, the chapter explores how a more musical
approach to the study of engineering could inform the more effective development of creative engineers.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCreativity and Innovation in STEM Education
EditorsFredricka Reisman
Chapter3
Pages58-90
Number of pages32
VolumeVII
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018
EventInternational Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise (KIE 2018) - Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 18 Jul 201820 Jul 2018

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise (KIE 2018)
CountryCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period18/07/1820/07/18

Fingerprint

creativity
engineering
engineer
interference
expertise
experience

Bibliographical note

© All rights reserved.
You are welcome to copy this publication for scholarly or noncommercial
use. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without permission in writing from the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • STEM
  • pedagogy
  • Innovation

Cite this

Wilson, C., Brown, M., & Lennox, P. (2018). Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas. In F. Reisman (Ed.), Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education (Vol. VII, pp. 58-90)
Wilson, Christopher ; Brown, Michael ; Lennox, Peter. / Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas. Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education. editor / Fredricka Reisman. Vol. VII 2018. pp. 58-90
@inbook{3dbfa086ac7940e6844c46d7faf5ea7d,
title = "Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas",
abstract = "This chapter explores the distinctive and often contrasting educational approaches associated with engineering and musical disciplines. Both inherently'practical' subjects with a rich body of underlying 'technical' knowledge andrich historical heritage, convention nevertheless determines often highly contrasting educational approaches to their study and fundamentally differentconceptions of subject identity. Acknowledging a shared focus on the valueof creativity, this chapter interrogates the notional differences in pedagogybetween the two disciplines—their subject traditions—and considers the extentto which particular experiences of subject consequently inform futurebehavioural attitudes and the realization of creative potential. Exploring howmusic and engineering reflect very different schemas, the chapter considershow cross-fertilization between subjects might frame different conceptions ofcreativity and inform alternative educational strategies. Noting, for example,the concept of 'proactive interference' and the potential for cognitive inflexibilitythrough mastery and expertise, the chapter explores how a more musicalapproach to the study of engineering could inform the more effective development of creative engineers.",
keywords = "Creativity, STEM, pedagogy, Innovation",
author = "Christopher Wilson and Michael Brown and Peter Lennox",
note = "{\circledC} All rights reserved. You are welcome to copy this publication for scholarly or noncommercial use. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the copyright holders.",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-85924-261-2",
volume = "VII",
pages = "58--90",
editor = "Fredricka Reisman",
booktitle = "Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education",

}

Wilson, C, Brown, M & Lennox, P 2018, Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas. in F Reisman (ed.), Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education. vol. VII, pp. 58-90, International Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise (KIE 2018), Prague, Czech Republic, 18/07/18.

Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas. / Wilson, Christopher; Brown, Michael; Lennox, Peter.

Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education. ed. / Fredricka Reisman. Vol. VII 2018. p. 58-90.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas

AU - Wilson, Christopher

AU - Brown, Michael

AU - Lennox, Peter

N1 - © All rights reserved. You are welcome to copy this publication for scholarly or noncommercial use. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the copyright holders.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - This chapter explores the distinctive and often contrasting educational approaches associated with engineering and musical disciplines. Both inherently'practical' subjects with a rich body of underlying 'technical' knowledge andrich historical heritage, convention nevertheless determines often highly contrasting educational approaches to their study and fundamentally differentconceptions of subject identity. Acknowledging a shared focus on the valueof creativity, this chapter interrogates the notional differences in pedagogybetween the two disciplines—their subject traditions—and considers the extentto which particular experiences of subject consequently inform futurebehavioural attitudes and the realization of creative potential. Exploring howmusic and engineering reflect very different schemas, the chapter considershow cross-fertilization between subjects might frame different conceptions ofcreativity and inform alternative educational strategies. Noting, for example,the concept of 'proactive interference' and the potential for cognitive inflexibilitythrough mastery and expertise, the chapter explores how a more musicalapproach to the study of engineering could inform the more effective development of creative engineers.

AB - This chapter explores the distinctive and often contrasting educational approaches associated with engineering and musical disciplines. Both inherently'practical' subjects with a rich body of underlying 'technical' knowledge andrich historical heritage, convention nevertheless determines often highly contrasting educational approaches to their study and fundamentally differentconceptions of subject identity. Acknowledging a shared focus on the valueof creativity, this chapter interrogates the notional differences in pedagogybetween the two disciplines—their subject traditions—and considers the extentto which particular experiences of subject consequently inform futurebehavioural attitudes and the realization of creative potential. Exploring howmusic and engineering reflect very different schemas, the chapter considershow cross-fertilization between subjects might frame different conceptions ofcreativity and inform alternative educational strategies. Noting, for example,the concept of 'proactive interference' and the potential for cognitive inflexibilitythrough mastery and expertise, the chapter explores how a more musicalapproach to the study of engineering could inform the more effective development of creative engineers.

KW - Creativity

KW - STEM

KW - pedagogy

KW - Innovation

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-1-85924-261-2

VL - VII

SP - 58

EP - 90

BT - Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education

A2 - Reisman, Fredricka

ER -

Wilson C, Brown M, Lennox P. Engineering creativity: Exploring disciplinary difference as the basis for new pedagogical ideas. In Reisman F, editor, Creativity and Innovation in STEM Education. Vol. VII. 2018. p. 58-90