Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry

Daniel H. Baker, Erich W. Graf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relative dominance of gratings engaged in binocular rivalry can be influenced by their surroundings. One striking example occurs when surrounding motion is congruent with one but not the other grating (C. L. Paffen, S. F. te Pas, R. Kanai, M. J. van der Smagt, & F. A. Verstraten, 2004). However, such center-surround stimulus configurations can also modulate perceived speed, via a directionally tuned process (H. P. Norman, J. F. Norman, J. T. Todd, & D. T. Lindsey, 1996). We recorded rivalry for Gabor patches embedded in a drifting noise texture. Gratings whose directions opposed the background motion tended to dominate more, and vice versa, consistent with previous findings. Observers then matched the speed of a drifting noise-embedded Gabor to that of a Gabor surrounded by mean luminance. Surround motion produced substantial changes in perceived speed, by at least a factor of two for all observers. We then asked whether perceived speed could account for the contextual effects on dominance. We measured the effects of speed on rivalry dominance by changing the physical speeds of rivaling gratings, as determined by the matching data. We found the same pattern of dominance as for the context experiment, indicating that perceived and true speed influence rivalry in the same manner. We propose a Bayesian interpretation of the perceived speed illusion.
Original languageEnglish
Article number26
Pages (from-to)26.1-12
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Noise
Direction compound

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

Keywords

  • binocular rivalry
  • motion
  • center-surround
  • context

Cite this

Baker, Daniel H. ; Graf, Erich W. / Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry. In: Journal of Vision. 2008 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 26.1-12.
@article{10c2e361aa724288b5e2cd02c93ba9b8,
title = "Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry",
abstract = "The relative dominance of gratings engaged in binocular rivalry can be influenced by their surroundings. One striking example occurs when surrounding motion is congruent with one but not the other grating (C. L. Paffen, S. F. te Pas, R. Kanai, M. J. van der Smagt, & F. A. Verstraten, 2004). However, such center-surround stimulus configurations can also modulate perceived speed, via a directionally tuned process (H. P. Norman, J. F. Norman, J. T. Todd, & D. T. Lindsey, 1996). We recorded rivalry for Gabor patches embedded in a drifting noise texture. Gratings whose directions opposed the background motion tended to dominate more, and vice versa, consistent with previous findings. Observers then matched the speed of a drifting noise-embedded Gabor to that of a Gabor surrounded by mean luminance. Surround motion produced substantial changes in perceived speed, by at least a factor of two for all observers. We then asked whether perceived speed could account for the contextual effects on dominance. We measured the effects of speed on rivalry dominance by changing the physical speeds of rivaling gratings, as determined by the matching data. We found the same pattern of dominance as for the context experiment, indicating that perceived and true speed influence rivalry in the same manner. We propose a Bayesian interpretation of the perceived speed illusion.",
keywords = "binocular rivalry, motion, center-surround, context",
author = "Baker, {Daniel H.} and Graf, {Erich W.}",
note = "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1167/8.4.26",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "26.1--12",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry. / Baker, Daniel H.; Graf, Erich W.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 8, No. 4, 26, 25.04.2008, p. 26.1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equivalence of physical and perceived speed in binocular rivalry

AU - Baker, Daniel H.

AU - Graf, Erich W.

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

PY - 2008/4/25

Y1 - 2008/4/25

N2 - The relative dominance of gratings engaged in binocular rivalry can be influenced by their surroundings. One striking example occurs when surrounding motion is congruent with one but not the other grating (C. L. Paffen, S. F. te Pas, R. Kanai, M. J. van der Smagt, & F. A. Verstraten, 2004). However, such center-surround stimulus configurations can also modulate perceived speed, via a directionally tuned process (H. P. Norman, J. F. Norman, J. T. Todd, & D. T. Lindsey, 1996). We recorded rivalry for Gabor patches embedded in a drifting noise texture. Gratings whose directions opposed the background motion tended to dominate more, and vice versa, consistent with previous findings. Observers then matched the speed of a drifting noise-embedded Gabor to that of a Gabor surrounded by mean luminance. Surround motion produced substantial changes in perceived speed, by at least a factor of two for all observers. We then asked whether perceived speed could account for the contextual effects on dominance. We measured the effects of speed on rivalry dominance by changing the physical speeds of rivaling gratings, as determined by the matching data. We found the same pattern of dominance as for the context experiment, indicating that perceived and true speed influence rivalry in the same manner. We propose a Bayesian interpretation of the perceived speed illusion.

AB - The relative dominance of gratings engaged in binocular rivalry can be influenced by their surroundings. One striking example occurs when surrounding motion is congruent with one but not the other grating (C. L. Paffen, S. F. te Pas, R. Kanai, M. J. van der Smagt, & F. A. Verstraten, 2004). However, such center-surround stimulus configurations can also modulate perceived speed, via a directionally tuned process (H. P. Norman, J. F. Norman, J. T. Todd, & D. T. Lindsey, 1996). We recorded rivalry for Gabor patches embedded in a drifting noise texture. Gratings whose directions opposed the background motion tended to dominate more, and vice versa, consistent with previous findings. Observers then matched the speed of a drifting noise-embedded Gabor to that of a Gabor surrounded by mean luminance. Surround motion produced substantial changes in perceived speed, by at least a factor of two for all observers. We then asked whether perceived speed could account for the contextual effects on dominance. We measured the effects of speed on rivalry dominance by changing the physical speeds of rivaling gratings, as determined by the matching data. We found the same pattern of dominance as for the context experiment, indicating that perceived and true speed influence rivalry in the same manner. We propose a Bayesian interpretation of the perceived speed illusion.

KW - binocular rivalry

KW - motion

KW - center-surround

KW - context

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42649099949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.journalofvision.org/8/4/26/

U2 - 10.1167/8.4.26

DO - 10.1167/8.4.26

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 26.1-12

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 4

M1 - 26

ER -