Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology

  • Suleman Aktaa*
  • , Amr Abdin
  • , Elena Arbelo
  • , Haran Burri
  • , Kevin Vernooy
  • , Carina Blomström-lundqvist
  • , Giuseppe Boriani
  • , Pascal Defaye
  • , Jean-claude Deharo
  • , Inga Drossart
  • , Dan Foldager
  • , Michael R Gold
  • , Jens Brock Johansen
  • , Francisco Leyva-Leon
  • , Cecilia Linde
  • , Yoav Michowitz
  • , Mads Brix Kronborg
  • , David Slotwiner
  • , Torkel Steen
  • , José Maria Tolosana
  • Stylianos Tzeis, Niraj Varma, Michael Glikson, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Chris P Gale
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
  • Internal Medicine Clinic III, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
  • Cardiology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Department of Medical Science and Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
  • Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmias Unit, University Hospital Grenoble Alps and Grenoble Alps University, Grenoble, France
  • Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital de la Timone, APHM, Marseille, France
  • Drossart (Belguim), ESC Patient Forum, Sophia Antipolis
  • Foldager(Denmark), ESC Patient Forum, Sophia Antipolis, France
  • Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
  • Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
  • Cardiology Department, Shaare Zedek Hospital, Affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Cardiology Division, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
  • Centre for Pacemakers and ICDs, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway
  • Institut d'Investigacións Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
  • Cardiology Department, Mitera General Hospital, Hygeia Group, Athens, Greece
  • Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims:
To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the care and outcomes for adults undergoing cardiac pacing.

Methods and results:
Under the auspice of the Clinical Practice Guideline Quality Indicator Committee of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Working Group for cardiac pacing QIs was formed. The Group comprised Task Force members of the 2021 ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, members of the European Heart Rhythm Association, international cardiac device experts, and patient representatives. We followed the ESC methodology for QI development, which involved (i) the identification of the key domains of care by constructing a conceptual framework of the management of patients receiving cardiac pacing, (ii) the development of candidate QIs by conducting a systematic review of the literature, (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs using a modified-Delphi method, and (iv) the evaluation of the feasibility of the developed QIs. Four domains of care were identified: (i) structural framework, (ii) patient assessment, (iii) pacing strategy, and (iv) clinical outcomes. In total, seven main and four secondary QIs were selected across these domains and were embedded within the 2021 ESC Guidelines on Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization therapy.

Conclusion:
By way of a standardized process, 11 QIs for cardiac pacing were developed. These indicators may be used to quantify adherence to guideline-recommended clinical practice and have the potential to improve the care and outcomes of patients receiving cardiac pacemakers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-172
Number of pages8
JournalEuropace
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date29 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright: The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected].

Keywords

  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Quality indicators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this