Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation

J.A. Barton, Doug M. Love, G.D. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Concurrent engineering and design for manufacture and assembly strategies have become pervasive in use in a wide array of industrial settings. These strategies have generally focused on product and process design issues based on capability concerns. The strategies have been historically justified using cost savings calculations focusing on easily quantifiable costs such as raw material savings or manufacturing or assembly operations no longer required. It is argued herein that neither the focus of the strategies nor the means of justification are adequate. Product and process design strategies should include both capability and capacity concerns and justification procedures should include the financial effects that the product and process changes would have on the entire company. The authors of this paper take this more holistic view of the problem and examine an innovative new design strategy using a comprehensive enterprise simulation tool. The results indicate that both the design strategy and the simulator show promise for further industrial use. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-299
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2001


  • design for manufacture and assembly
  • capacity analysis
  • enterprise simulation


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this