Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation

J.A. Barton, Doug M. Love, G.D. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Concurrent engineering and design for manufacture and assembly strategies have become pervasive in use in a wide array of industrial settings. These strategies have generally focused on product and process design issues based on capability concerns. The strategies have been historically justified using cost savings calculations focusing on easily quantifiable costs such as raw material savings or manufacturing or assembly operations no longer required. It is argued herein that neither the focus of the strategies nor the means of justification are adequate. Product and process design strategies should include both capability and capacity concerns and justification procedures should include the financial effects that the product and process changes would have on the entire company. The authors of this paper take this more holistic view of the problem and examine an innovative new design strategy using a comprehensive enterprise simulation tool. The results indicate that both the design strategy and the simulator show promise for further industrial use. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-299
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2001

Fingerprint

Product design
Process design
Industry
Concurrent engineering
Costs
Raw materials
Simulators
Simulation
Strategy implementation
Justification

Keywords

  • design for manufacture and assembly
  • capacity analysis
  • enterprise simulation

Cite this

Barton, J.A. ; Love, Doug M. ; Taylor, G.D. / Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation. In: International Journal of Production Economics. 2001 ; Vol. 72, No. 3. pp. 285-299.
@article{2ae705b4616b4f068e7fcd6e647ee452,
title = "Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation",
abstract = "Concurrent engineering and design for manufacture and assembly strategies have become pervasive in use in a wide array of industrial settings. These strategies have generally focused on product and process design issues based on capability concerns. The strategies have been historically justified using cost savings calculations focusing on easily quantifiable costs such as raw material savings or manufacturing or assembly operations no longer required. It is argued herein that neither the focus of the strategies nor the means of justification are adequate. Product and process design strategies should include both capability and capacity concerns and justification procedures should include the financial effects that the product and process changes would have on the entire company. The authors of this paper take this more holistic view of the problem and examine an innovative new design strategy using a comprehensive enterprise simulation tool. The results indicate that both the design strategy and the simulator show promise for further industrial use. {\circledC} 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "design for manufacture and assembly, capacity analysis, enterprise simulation",
author = "J.A. Barton and Love, {Doug M.} and G.D. Taylor",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00164-X",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "285--299",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation. / Barton, J.A.; Love, Doug M.; Taylor, G.D.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 72, No. 3, 13.08.2001, p. 285-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating design implementation strategies using enterprise simulation

AU - Barton, J.A.

AU - Love, Doug M.

AU - Taylor, G.D.

PY - 2001/8/13

Y1 - 2001/8/13

N2 - Concurrent engineering and design for manufacture and assembly strategies have become pervasive in use in a wide array of industrial settings. These strategies have generally focused on product and process design issues based on capability concerns. The strategies have been historically justified using cost savings calculations focusing on easily quantifiable costs such as raw material savings or manufacturing or assembly operations no longer required. It is argued herein that neither the focus of the strategies nor the means of justification are adequate. Product and process design strategies should include both capability and capacity concerns and justification procedures should include the financial effects that the product and process changes would have on the entire company. The authors of this paper take this more holistic view of the problem and examine an innovative new design strategy using a comprehensive enterprise simulation tool. The results indicate that both the design strategy and the simulator show promise for further industrial use. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Concurrent engineering and design for manufacture and assembly strategies have become pervasive in use in a wide array of industrial settings. These strategies have generally focused on product and process design issues based on capability concerns. The strategies have been historically justified using cost savings calculations focusing on easily quantifiable costs such as raw material savings or manufacturing or assembly operations no longer required. It is argued herein that neither the focus of the strategies nor the means of justification are adequate. Product and process design strategies should include both capability and capacity concerns and justification procedures should include the financial effects that the product and process changes would have on the entire company. The authors of this paper take this more holistic view of the problem and examine an innovative new design strategy using a comprehensive enterprise simulation tool. The results indicate that both the design strategy and the simulator show promise for further industrial use. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - design for manufacture and assembly

KW - capacity analysis

KW - enterprise simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035855392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552730000164X?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00164-X

DO - 10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00164-X

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 285

EP - 299

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 3

ER -