Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the 'brainstormed' ideas

Duncan Shaw*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores how participants work in a new format of brainstorm, called an 'incubated gathering'. The paper explores brainstorm-type activities, where senior managers share occupational knowledge in the generation of a solution to a problem in which they have an embedded interest. The findings suggest that participants perceive great worth in the incubated gathering, and (compared to other formats of gathering) it allows participants to consider a significantly wider range of issues, and in more detail. They also suggest that an outcome from an incubated gathering will be informed by a more rich consideration of the pertinent issues than that from other formats of brainstorming. This paper substantiates these claims with evidence from a suite of new approaches to gauge the ability of participants to share knowledge during group brainstorming-type activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-705
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume54
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Gages
Managers
Brainstorming
Senior managers

Keywords

  • brainstorming
  • facilitation
  • group decision support
  • problem structuring
  • soft OR

Cite this

@article{f24e786ed3f44104835258e9a22e1cf4,
title = "Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the 'brainstormed' ideas",
abstract = "This paper explores how participants work in a new format of brainstorm, called an 'incubated gathering'. The paper explores brainstorm-type activities, where senior managers share occupational knowledge in the generation of a solution to a problem in which they have an embedded interest. The findings suggest that participants perceive great worth in the incubated gathering, and (compared to other formats of gathering) it allows participants to consider a significantly wider range of issues, and in more detail. They also suggest that an outcome from an incubated gathering will be informed by a more rich consideration of the pertinent issues than that from other formats of brainstorming. This paper substantiates these claims with evidence from a suite of new approaches to gauge the ability of participants to share knowledge during group brainstorming-type activities.",
keywords = "brainstorming, facilitation, group decision support, problem structuring, soft OR",
author = "Duncan Shaw",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601568",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "692--705",
journal = "Journal of the Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the 'brainstormed' ideas. / Shaw, Duncan.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 54, No. 7, 2003, p. 692-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the 'brainstormed' ideas

AU - Shaw, Duncan

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper explores how participants work in a new format of brainstorm, called an 'incubated gathering'. The paper explores brainstorm-type activities, where senior managers share occupational knowledge in the generation of a solution to a problem in which they have an embedded interest. The findings suggest that participants perceive great worth in the incubated gathering, and (compared to other formats of gathering) it allows participants to consider a significantly wider range of issues, and in more detail. They also suggest that an outcome from an incubated gathering will be informed by a more rich consideration of the pertinent issues than that from other formats of brainstorming. This paper substantiates these claims with evidence from a suite of new approaches to gauge the ability of participants to share knowledge during group brainstorming-type activities.

AB - This paper explores how participants work in a new format of brainstorm, called an 'incubated gathering'. The paper explores brainstorm-type activities, where senior managers share occupational knowledge in the generation of a solution to a problem in which they have an embedded interest. The findings suggest that participants perceive great worth in the incubated gathering, and (compared to other formats of gathering) it allows participants to consider a significantly wider range of issues, and in more detail. They also suggest that an outcome from an incubated gathering will be informed by a more rich consideration of the pertinent issues than that from other formats of brainstorming. This paper substantiates these claims with evidence from a suite of new approaches to gauge the ability of participants to share knowledge during group brainstorming-type activities.

KW - brainstorming

KW - facilitation

KW - group decision support

KW - problem structuring

KW - soft OR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037559419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601568

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601568

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 692

EP - 705

JO - Journal of the Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of the Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

IS - 7

ER -