Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students

  • Wendy Leadbeater
  • , Tom Shuttleworth
  • , John Couperthwaite
  • , Karl P. Nightingale*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University College Birmingham

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    120   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    Lecture recordings are increasingly used to supplement lecture attendance within higher education, but their impact on student learning remains unclear. Here we describe a study to evaluate student use of lecture recordings and quantify their impact on academic performance. Questionnaire responses and online monitoring of student's access to recordings indicate that ∼75% students use this material, the majority in a targeted manner. In contrast, a small subset of students (∼5%) are highly dependent on recordings downloading every lecture, and viewing the material for long periods, such that this represents a large proportion of their independent study. This 'high user' group is atypical, as it contains a high proportion of dyslexic and Non-English Speaking Background students. Despite high usage, lecture recordings do not have a significant impact on academic performance, either across the cohort or with students that use the recordings. Overall, this approach appears to be beneficial, but may reduce lecture attendance and encourage surface learning approaches in a minority of students.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)185-192
    Number of pages8
    JournalComputers and Education
    Volume61
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

    Keywords

    • Action reasearch
    • Dyslexia
    • Evaluation of impact
    • Lecture recording

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this