Abstract
We approach the issue of interpretability in artificial intelligence and law through the lens of evolutionary theory. Evolution is understood as a form of blind or mindless ‘direct fitting’, an iterative process through which a system and its environment are mutually constituted and aligned. The core case is natural selection as described in biology but it is not the only one. Legal reasoning can be understood as a step in the ‘direct fitting’ of law, through a cycle of variation, selection and retention, to its social context. Machine learning, insofar as it relies on error correction through backpropagation, is a version of the same process. It may therefore have value for understanding the long-run dynamics of legal and social change. This is distinct, however, from any use it may have in predicting case outcomes. Legal interpretation in the context of the individual or instant case depends upon the generative power of natural language to extrapolate from existing precedents to novel fact situations. This type of prospective or forward-looking reasoning is unlikely to be well captured by machine learning approaches.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2022 Simon Deakin, Christopher Markou. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evolutionary Interpretation: Law and Machine Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver