Explaining leadership in family firms: Reflexivity, social conditioning and institutional complexity

Tim Edwards, Elina Meliou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on leadership in family firms has concentrated on the drivers of performance viewed in the context of reciprocal family and business logics, family or non-family CEOs operating within different family governance and administrative settings. The explanatory aim is to ascertain the optimum configuration of elements for achieving improved economic rents so the benefits of family loyalty do not negatively impact firm performance. Our thesis challenges this research, which treats family leadership as a contingent outcome of the governance and administrative contexts within which family and non-family CEOs make strategic choices. We argue that family leadership studies restrict explanations of action to a narrow bandwidth because leadership is effectively black-boxed when it is treated as an outcome of these contingent relations. To overcome this limitation we propose a nested framing of social conditioning that explains the connections between actors, organizations and multiple social orders (and not just family and business). Our contribution is to theorize family leadership in the context of multiple ‘social context – personal preference’ modes; that is, leadership is conceived through reflexivity, which is the personal process mediating the effects of our circumstances upon our actions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1271-1289
JournalHuman Relations
Volume68
Issue number8
Early online date18 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

reflexivity
conditioning
leadership
firm
Industry
Bandwidth
Economics
Conditioning
Family firms
Reflexivity
Institutional complexity
Family Firms
governance
social order
loyalty
rent
performance
driver

Cite this

@article{0ae0505021404b6991d83e3cae2dd6ec,
title = "Explaining leadership in family firms: Reflexivity, social conditioning and institutional complexity",
abstract = "Research on leadership in family firms has concentrated on the drivers of performance viewed in the context of reciprocal family and business logics, family or non-family CEOs operating within different family governance and administrative settings. The explanatory aim is to ascertain the optimum configuration of elements for achieving improved economic rents so the benefits of family loyalty do not negatively impact firm performance. Our thesis challenges this research, which treats family leadership as a contingent outcome of the governance and administrative contexts within which family and non-family CEOs make strategic choices. We argue that family leadership studies restrict explanations of action to a narrow bandwidth because leadership is effectively black-boxed when it is treated as an outcome of these contingent relations. To overcome this limitation we propose a nested framing of social conditioning that explains the connections between actors, organizations and multiple social orders (and not just family and business). Our contribution is to theorize family leadership in the context of multiple ‘social context – personal preference’ modes; that is, leadership is conceived through reflexivity, which is the personal process mediating the effects of our circumstances upon our actions.",
author = "Tim Edwards and Elina Meliou",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726714554468",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1271--1289",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "8",

}

Explaining leadership in family firms: Reflexivity, social conditioning and institutional complexity. / Edwards, Tim; Meliou, Elina.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 68, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 1271-1289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining leadership in family firms: Reflexivity, social conditioning and institutional complexity

AU - Edwards, Tim

AU - Meliou, Elina

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Research on leadership in family firms has concentrated on the drivers of performance viewed in the context of reciprocal family and business logics, family or non-family CEOs operating within different family governance and administrative settings. The explanatory aim is to ascertain the optimum configuration of elements for achieving improved economic rents so the benefits of family loyalty do not negatively impact firm performance. Our thesis challenges this research, which treats family leadership as a contingent outcome of the governance and administrative contexts within which family and non-family CEOs make strategic choices. We argue that family leadership studies restrict explanations of action to a narrow bandwidth because leadership is effectively black-boxed when it is treated as an outcome of these contingent relations. To overcome this limitation we propose a nested framing of social conditioning that explains the connections between actors, organizations and multiple social orders (and not just family and business). Our contribution is to theorize family leadership in the context of multiple ‘social context – personal preference’ modes; that is, leadership is conceived through reflexivity, which is the personal process mediating the effects of our circumstances upon our actions.

AB - Research on leadership in family firms has concentrated on the drivers of performance viewed in the context of reciprocal family and business logics, family or non-family CEOs operating within different family governance and administrative settings. The explanatory aim is to ascertain the optimum configuration of elements for achieving improved economic rents so the benefits of family loyalty do not negatively impact firm performance. Our thesis challenges this research, which treats family leadership as a contingent outcome of the governance and administrative contexts within which family and non-family CEOs make strategic choices. We argue that family leadership studies restrict explanations of action to a narrow bandwidth because leadership is effectively black-boxed when it is treated as an outcome of these contingent relations. To overcome this limitation we propose a nested framing of social conditioning that explains the connections between actors, organizations and multiple social orders (and not just family and business). Our contribution is to theorize family leadership in the context of multiple ‘social context – personal preference’ modes; that is, leadership is conceived through reflexivity, which is the personal process mediating the effects of our circumstances upon our actions.

UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018726714554468

U2 - 10.1177/0018726714554468

DO - 10.1177/0018726714554468

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 1271

EP - 1289

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 8

ER -