Abstract
Objective:
Hearing loss is a concern globally which can present challenges for those affected and their communication partners. This study explored the experiences of individuals providing support for people with hearing loss, focusing on caregiver burden.
Design:
Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with communication partners and parental caregivers. Template analysis, guided by Burden of Treatment Theory, explored illness burden (the daily impact of a health condition) and treatment burden (the workload involved in managing care).
Study Sample:
Twenty-seven caregivers of people with hearing loss participated, representing diverse ages and relationship types.
Results:
Analysis focused on two a priori burden domains: illness burden and treatment burden, while recognising resources that could alleviate burdens. Illness burden included assuming the role of mediator, emotional work, and changes in communication. Treatment burden themes encompassed managing medical and audiological care and maintaining hearing devices and assistive technology. Resources identified included sharing knowledge, empathising with the person with hearing loss, and working as a team.
Conclusions:
Caregiving in the context of hearing loss is complex and multifaceted. These findings highlight the potential for targeted resources and support for parents and communication partners to improve experiences of individuals with hearing loss and their supporters.
Hearing loss is a concern globally which can present challenges for those affected and their communication partners. This study explored the experiences of individuals providing support for people with hearing loss, focusing on caregiver burden.
Design:
Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with communication partners and parental caregivers. Template analysis, guided by Burden of Treatment Theory, explored illness burden (the daily impact of a health condition) and treatment burden (the workload involved in managing care).
Study Sample:
Twenty-seven caregivers of people with hearing loss participated, representing diverse ages and relationship types.
Results:
Analysis focused on two a priori burden domains: illness burden and treatment burden, while recognising resources that could alleviate burdens. Illness burden included assuming the role of mediator, emotional work, and changes in communication. Treatment burden themes encompassed managing medical and audiological care and maintaining hearing devices and assistive technology. Resources identified included sharing knowledge, empathising with the person with hearing loss, and working as a team.
Conclusions:
Caregiving in the context of hearing loss is complex and multifaceted. These findings highlight the potential for targeted resources and support for parents and communication partners to improve experiences of individuals with hearing loss and their supporters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | International Journal of Audiology |
| Early online date | 30 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 30 Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.Keywords
- Audiology
- family-centered care
- hearing loss
- illness burden
- qualitative
- treatment burden
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring caregiver burdens and resources among parents and communication partners of people with hearing loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver