Facilitating Meaningfulness in the Workplace: A Field Intervention Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article presents the findings of a field intervention study that sought to address two objectives: (a) what are the psychological effects of a meaningfulness intervention? and (b) what key issues should be considered when developing meaningfulness interventions? Eighty employees from three different organizations based in the UK were allocated to either the intervention condition or a wait-list control group. Compared against the wait-list control group, the meaningfulness intervention facilitated meaningfulness in/at work, job/organization engagement, and personal initiative. Finally, focus group interviews revealed a number of micro (e.g., sustaining motivation), meso (e.g., role of line managers) and macro (e.g., socio-political events) level issues that should be considered when planning and implementing meaningfulness interventions. Overall this study makes use of field intervention research in order to develop the rationale for incorporating meaningfulness theories and concepts within HRM practice, particularly in better aligning personal development, team-based learning and performance management activities.

LanguageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Human Resource Management
Early online date10 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Macros
Managers
Personnel
Planning
Work place

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The International Journal of Human Resource Management on 10 June 2019, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590

Keywords

  • employee engagement
  • Field intervention
  • meaningful work
  • mixed methods
  • personal initiative

Cite this

@article{1185536f57ea47279d859d52804ffcb1,
title = "Facilitating Meaningfulness in the Workplace: A Field Intervention Study",
abstract = "This article presents the findings of a field intervention study that sought to address two objectives: (a) what are the psychological effects of a meaningfulness intervention? and (b) what key issues should be considered when developing meaningfulness interventions? Eighty employees from three different organizations based in the UK were allocated to either the intervention condition or a wait-list control group. Compared against the wait-list control group, the meaningfulness intervention facilitated meaningfulness in/at work, job/organization engagement, and personal initiative. Finally, focus group interviews revealed a number of micro (e.g., sustaining motivation), meso (e.g., role of line managers) and macro (e.g., socio-political events) level issues that should be considered when planning and implementing meaningfulness interventions. Overall this study makes use of field intervention research in order to develop the rationale for incorporating meaningfulness theories and concepts within HRM practice, particularly in better aligning personal development, team-based learning and performance management activities.",
keywords = "employee engagement, Field intervention, meaningful work, mixed methods, personal initiative",
author = "Luke Fletcher and Keith Schofield",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The International Journal of Human Resource Management on 10 June 2019, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Human Resource Management",
issn = "0958-5192",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitating Meaningfulness in the Workplace: A Field Intervention Study

AU - Fletcher, Luke

AU - Schofield, Keith

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The International Journal of Human Resource Management on 10 June 2019, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - This article presents the findings of a field intervention study that sought to address two objectives: (a) what are the psychological effects of a meaningfulness intervention? and (b) what key issues should be considered when developing meaningfulness interventions? Eighty employees from three different organizations based in the UK were allocated to either the intervention condition or a wait-list control group. Compared against the wait-list control group, the meaningfulness intervention facilitated meaningfulness in/at work, job/organization engagement, and personal initiative. Finally, focus group interviews revealed a number of micro (e.g., sustaining motivation), meso (e.g., role of line managers) and macro (e.g., socio-political events) level issues that should be considered when planning and implementing meaningfulness interventions. Overall this study makes use of field intervention research in order to develop the rationale for incorporating meaningfulness theories and concepts within HRM practice, particularly in better aligning personal development, team-based learning and performance management activities.

AB - This article presents the findings of a field intervention study that sought to address two objectives: (a) what are the psychological effects of a meaningfulness intervention? and (b) what key issues should be considered when developing meaningfulness interventions? Eighty employees from three different organizations based in the UK were allocated to either the intervention condition or a wait-list control group. Compared against the wait-list control group, the meaningfulness intervention facilitated meaningfulness in/at work, job/organization engagement, and personal initiative. Finally, focus group interviews revealed a number of micro (e.g., sustaining motivation), meso (e.g., role of line managers) and macro (e.g., socio-political events) level issues that should be considered when planning and implementing meaningfulness interventions. Overall this study makes use of field intervention research in order to develop the rationale for incorporating meaningfulness theories and concepts within HRM practice, particularly in better aligning personal development, team-based learning and performance management activities.

KW - employee engagement

KW - Field intervention

KW - meaningful work

KW - mixed methods

KW - personal initiative

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067547460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590

DO - 10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management

T2 - International Journal of Human Resource Management

JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management

SN - 0958-5192

ER -