Facilitators and barriers to recruitment and retention in a feasibility trial of encapsulated faecal microbiota transplant to eradicate carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria at an academic hospital in central London: a nested qualitative study

Blair Merrick, Désirée Prossomariti, Michael Kertanegara, David Wyatt, Simon Goldenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives This nested qualitative study (NQS) aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to the delivery of a substantive randomised controlled trial investigating the eradication of gastrointestinal tract carriage of antibiotic-resistant organisms using encapsulated faecal microbiota transplant (FMT).

Design NQS within a participant-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, single-centre, feasibility trial (RCT)—Feasibility of ERadicating gastrointestinal carriage of Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms (FERARO) (ISRCTN reg. no. 34 467 677)—with data collected via focus groups and analysed using thematic analysis.

Setting RCT participants were recruited from a large academic tertiary referral hospital in central London. Focus groups were held at the hospital or via videoconferencing for those unable to travel.

Participants This study included 13 FERARO study participants across two focus groups. 11 participants were under RCT follow-up and unaware of their treatment allocation, two participants had completed 6-month follow-up and knew whether they had received FMT or matched placebo. Additional data were opportunistically collected on reasons for declining RCT participation.

Results Participants found FMT to be an acceptable and holistic management strategy and noted positive impacts from RCT participation including enhanced personal health awareness and valuable support from the research team. The time and travel commitment presented the most substantial barrier to RCT participation. Many participants were motivated by a desire to give something back to the UK National Health Service and/or research. Patients’ current health status also influenced the decision-making process, and, while infrequently cited, the COVID-19 pandemic added extra complexity likely impacting individuals’ willingness to participate.

Conclusions While FMT is generally acceptable to participants, logistical barriers such as the time and travel commitment associated with RCT participation need consideration. Effective communication, personal connections and participant education on antimicrobial resistance are likely to be crucial for enhancing recruitment and retention in future trials.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere104783
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number11
Early online date19 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Data Access Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Funding

This research was funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) grant scheme. Award ID: PB-PG-0418-20007. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Keywords

  • Feasibility Studies
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome
  • Microbiota
  • Patient Participation
  • QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitators and barriers to recruitment and retention in a feasibility trial of encapsulated faecal microbiota transplant to eradicate carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria at an academic hospital in central London: a nested qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this