TY - JOUR
T1 - Friends or foes: Can large-scale mining companies partner with small-scale miners? Yes, they can?
AU - Ofosu, George
AU - Arthur-Holmes, Francis
AU - Siaw, Daniel
AU - Sarpong, David
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
PY - 2025/5/22
Y1 - 2025/5/22
N2 - This paper (re)examines the nexus between large-scale mining (LSM) activities and artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) operations. Broadly speaking, the existing combative resource politics between the two mining entities has created room for the emergence of divergent opinions on sustainable solutions encapsulated in standpoints of ‘cohabitation’ vis-à-vis ‘autonomy’. Employing ‘partnership’ as an analytical lens, this study provides a refreshing perspective of the ‘cohabitation’ of LSM and ASM where they develop and flourish together. Firmly rooted at the base of this success, however, is the formalisation canon that has long ignored the partnership opportunities for ASM operations in many resource-rich countries. We, therefore, argue for formalisation policies to design cohabitation agreements that focus on creating synergies devoid of resource conflicts. Further, we discuss ways through which resources that cannot be fully enclosed by LSM companies can become sources of compromise and negotiation rather than of conflict and violence.
AB - This paper (re)examines the nexus between large-scale mining (LSM) activities and artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) operations. Broadly speaking, the existing combative resource politics between the two mining entities has created room for the emergence of divergent opinions on sustainable solutions encapsulated in standpoints of ‘cohabitation’ vis-à-vis ‘autonomy’. Employing ‘partnership’ as an analytical lens, this study provides a refreshing perspective of the ‘cohabitation’ of LSM and ASM where they develop and flourish together. Firmly rooted at the base of this success, however, is the formalisation canon that has long ignored the partnership opportunities for ASM operations in many resource-rich countries. We, therefore, argue for formalisation policies to design cohabitation agreements that focus on creating synergies devoid of resource conflicts. Further, we discuss ways through which resources that cannot be fully enclosed by LSM companies can become sources of compromise and negotiation rather than of conflict and violence.
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001494
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005497998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103709
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103709
M3 - Article
SN - 0743-0167
VL - 119
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
M1 - 103709
ER -