From Subtypes to Taxons: Identifying Distinctive Profiles of Reading Development in Children

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The longstanding debate between dimensional and categorical approaches to reading difficulties has recently been rekindled by new empirical evidence and developments in theory. At the heart of the categorical perspective is the tenet that dyslexia is a taxon, a grouping of cases that can account for both intra-group similarities and inter-group differences. As developmental dyslexia is characterized by a diverse constellation of symptoms with multiple underlying risk and protective factors, the key question in dyslexia research has shifted from “What is dyslexia?” to “How many taxons or subtypes of dyslexia are there?” The primary objective of this chapter is to consider methods that can be used to objectively define these groupings, starting with the current practice of defining subtypes of readers using normative scores with pragmatically dened cut-offs, the “Quadrant Analysis” approach, and progressing towards more theoretically sound and statistically rigorous procedures. We review and test several candidate approaches that can be readily adapted to realistic conditions that are problematic for Quadrant Analysis. Specifically we propose a method that can be used to identify subgroups in the bivariate case when the two indicator variables are correlated. We conclude by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of this and other methods and include implications for their future application toward identifying and validating putative dyslexia taxons.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReading and Dyslexia
PublisherSpringer
Pages207-227
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2018

Publication series

NameReading and Dyslexia
Volume16
ISSN (Print)2214-000X
ISSN (Electronic)2214-0018

Fingerprint

dyslexia
grouping
candidacy
Group
evidence

Cite this

@inbook{c71bbb3f76a847cb897b1c9924ce7c14,
title = "From Subtypes to Taxons: Identifying Distinctive Profiles of Reading Development in Children",
abstract = "The longstanding debate between dimensional and categorical approaches to reading difficulties has recently been rekindled by new empirical evidence and developments in theory. At the heart of the categorical perspective is the tenet that dyslexia is a taxon, a grouping of cases that can account for both intra-group similarities and inter-group differences. As developmental dyslexia is characterized by a diverse constellation of symptoms with multiple underlying risk and protective factors, the key question in dyslexia research has shifted from “What is dyslexia?” to “How many taxons or subtypes of dyslexia are there?” The primary objective of this chapter is to consider methods that can be used to objectively define these groupings, starting with the current practice of defining subtypes of readers using normative scores with pragmatically dened cut-offs, the “Quadrant Analysis” approach, and progressing towards more theoretically sound and statistically rigorous procedures. We review and test several candidate approaches that can be readily adapted to realistic conditions that are problematic for Quadrant Analysis. Specifically we propose a method that can be used to identify subgroups in the bivariate case when the two indicator variables are correlated. We conclude by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of this and other methods and include implications for their future application toward identifying and validating putative dyslexia taxons.",
author = "Burgess, {Adrian P.} and Caroline Witton and Laura Shapiro and Talcott, {Joel B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_11",
language = "English",
series = "Reading and Dyslexia",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "207--227",
booktitle = "Reading and Dyslexia",
address = "Germany",

}

From Subtypes to Taxons : Identifying Distinctive Profiles of Reading Development in Children. / Burgess, Adrian P.; Witton, Caroline; Shapiro, Laura; Talcott, Joel B.

Reading and Dyslexia. Springer, 2018. p. 207-227 Chapter 11 (Reading and Dyslexia; Vol. 16).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - From Subtypes to Taxons

T2 - Identifying Distinctive Profiles of Reading Development in Children

AU - Burgess, Adrian P.

AU - Witton, Caroline

AU - Shapiro, Laura

AU - Talcott, Joel B.

PY - 2018/7/28

Y1 - 2018/7/28

N2 - The longstanding debate between dimensional and categorical approaches to reading difficulties has recently been rekindled by new empirical evidence and developments in theory. At the heart of the categorical perspective is the tenet that dyslexia is a taxon, a grouping of cases that can account for both intra-group similarities and inter-group differences. As developmental dyslexia is characterized by a diverse constellation of symptoms with multiple underlying risk and protective factors, the key question in dyslexia research has shifted from “What is dyslexia?” to “How many taxons or subtypes of dyslexia are there?” The primary objective of this chapter is to consider methods that can be used to objectively define these groupings, starting with the current practice of defining subtypes of readers using normative scores with pragmatically dened cut-offs, the “Quadrant Analysis” approach, and progressing towards more theoretically sound and statistically rigorous procedures. We review and test several candidate approaches that can be readily adapted to realistic conditions that are problematic for Quadrant Analysis. Specifically we propose a method that can be used to identify subgroups in the bivariate case when the two indicator variables are correlated. We conclude by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of this and other methods and include implications for their future application toward identifying and validating putative dyslexia taxons.

AB - The longstanding debate between dimensional and categorical approaches to reading difficulties has recently been rekindled by new empirical evidence and developments in theory. At the heart of the categorical perspective is the tenet that dyslexia is a taxon, a grouping of cases that can account for both intra-group similarities and inter-group differences. As developmental dyslexia is characterized by a diverse constellation of symptoms with multiple underlying risk and protective factors, the key question in dyslexia research has shifted from “What is dyslexia?” to “How many taxons or subtypes of dyslexia are there?” The primary objective of this chapter is to consider methods that can be used to objectively define these groupings, starting with the current practice of defining subtypes of readers using normative scores with pragmatically dened cut-offs, the “Quadrant Analysis” approach, and progressing towards more theoretically sound and statistically rigorous procedures. We review and test several candidate approaches that can be readily adapted to realistic conditions that are problematic for Quadrant Analysis. Specifically we propose a method that can be used to identify subgroups in the bivariate case when the two indicator variables are correlated. We conclude by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of this and other methods and include implications for their future application toward identifying and validating putative dyslexia taxons.

UR - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_11

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_11

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Reading and Dyslexia

SP - 207

EP - 227

BT - Reading and Dyslexia

PB - Springer

ER -