Functional architecture for binocular summation of luminance- and contrast-modulated gratings

A.J. Schofield, M.A. Georgeson

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract

Abstract

Combining signals from the two eyes is fundamental to stereo vision. We studied binocular summation for horizontal luminance gratings (L), luminance gratings in noise (LM) and second-order gratings(contrast-modulated noise, CM). Noise centre frequency was 6 c/deg, rms contrast 0.2 or 0.1. We measured 2AFC detection thresholds for gratings (0.75 c/deg, 0.2 s duration) shown to one eye, to botheyes in-phase, or both eyes in anti-phase. Mean binocular thresholds were 5–6 dB better than monocular thresholds for L, LM and CM: close to linear summation across the eyes. We found full binocular summation for CM even when the 2D noise carriers were uncorrelated or anti-correlated between the eyes, implying binocular combination of envelope, not carrier, responses. Similarly, binocular summation for CM occurred with uncorrelated, oblique 1D noise carriers at both parallel and orthogonal orientations,suggesting that CM summation is insensitive to carrier similarity or composition. In all cases anti-phase signals showed no summation and very little cancellation, consistent with half-wave rectification before binocular summation. These results suggest an extended filter-rectify-filter model with two filter-rectify stages preceding binocular summation (FRFRB), similar to the architecture proposed for cat area 18 (Tanaka and Ohzawa, 2006 Journal of Neuroscience 26 4370–4382).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-18
Number of pages2
JournalPerception
Volume40
Issue numberSuppl.1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2011
Event34th European Conference on Visual Perception - Toulouse, France
Duration: 28 Aug 20111 Sep 2011

Bibliographical note

ECVP 2011 Abstracts

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Functional architecture for binocular summation of luminance- and contrast-modulated gratings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • How much of noise masking derives from noise?

    Baker, D. H., Meese, T. S., Georgeson, M. A. & Hess, R. F., Aug 2011, In : Perception. 40, Suppl.1, p. 66-67 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract

  • Trajectories of part-based and configural object recognition in adolescence

    Juttner, M., Petters, D., Kaur, S., Wakui, E. & Davidoff, J., 1 Aug 2011, In : Perception. 40, Suppl.1, p. 72 1 p., 39.

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract

  • Cite this