Fundamental Aspects of Promise-Based Proprietary Estoppel: Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing

Adam Shaw-Mellors, Philippa Harper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Comments on the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal judgment in Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing on proprietary estoppel, land promised to family members, and work and expense undertaken in detrimental reliance on the asserted promise.

Cases cited
Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing [2021] HKCFA 19 (CFA (HK))
Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18; [2009] 1 W.L.R. 776; [2009] 3 WLUK 645 (HL)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-184
JournalTrust Law International
Volume35
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

This is the author's accepted manuscript. Please cite the final published version: Shaw-Mellors, A & Harper, P 2021, 'Fundamental Aspects of Promise-Based Proprietary Estoppel: Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing', Trust Law International, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 176-184. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I88A565404D3C11EC817DBD69092E1A87/View/FullText.html

Keywords

  • Hong Kong
  • Promises
  • Proprietary estoppel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fundamental Aspects of Promise-Based Proprietary Estoppel: Cheung Lai Mui v Cheung Wai Shing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this