Gender, Language and Leadership: Enabling Women Leaders

Judith A Baxter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

Women leaders in the workplace are a comparatively recent phenomenon, and because of their minority position, women continue to experience a range of barriers to their career progression. Many sociological, psychological and economic reasons have been explored to explain women’s lack of progress in ‘breaking the glass ceiling’, but hitherto, there has been little research exploring the possible sociolinguistic reasons, and providing practical solutions.
This chapter review the range of theories which variously explain the role of language in constructing barriers for women who aspire to leadership in the workplace. Dominance theory suggests that the social nature of language constructs men as more powerful and women as less so. Difference theory proposes that men and women evolve within different subcultures with men expected to be more competitive and goal-orientated, and women expected to be more cooperative and people-orientated. Both these theories assume that women’s socialized speech styles make them fundamentally unsuitable for leadership. Finally discursive or performativity theory, suggests that both female and male leaders can draw equally on a linguistic repertoire of resources normatively coded masculine and feminine. However, the presence of disempowering, gendered discourses in organizations can militate against women’s access to, and performance of senior roles.
By taking up performativity theory, I will argue that women can be empowered to access and perform leadership in more diverse, dynamic and challenging ways. I will present applied examples from the work of language and gender scholars such as Holmes (2006), Angouri (2011), Louise Mullany (2007) and my own (2010; 2014), to show how we can intervene to raise women’s awareness of the sociolinguistic strategies they can use, and the effects such strategies can achieve in the workplace.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace
EditorsBernadette Vine
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherRoutledge
Pages401-412
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameRoutledge Handbooks
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

leadership
leader
gender
language
workplace
sociolinguistics
subculture
career
minority
linguistics
discourse
lack
resources
performance
economics
experience

Cite this

Baxter, J. A. (2018). Gender, Language and Leadership: Enabling Women Leaders. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace (pp. 401-412). [32] (Routledge Handbooks). New York: Routledge.
Baxter, Judith A. / Gender, Language and Leadership : Enabling Women Leaders. The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace. editor / Bernadette Vine. New York : Routledge, 2018. pp. 401-412 (Routledge Handbooks).
@inbook{8ea300c180f641048d683d76fed564ea,
title = "Gender, Language and Leadership: Enabling Women Leaders",
abstract = "Women leaders in the workplace are a comparatively recent phenomenon, and because of their minority position, women continue to experience a range of barriers to their career progression. Many sociological, psychological and economic reasons have been explored to explain women’s lack of progress in ‘breaking the glass ceiling’, but hitherto, there has been little research exploring the possible sociolinguistic reasons, and providing practical solutions. This chapter review the range of theories which variously explain the role of language in constructing barriers for women who aspire to leadership in the workplace. Dominance theory suggests that the social nature of language constructs men as more powerful and women as less so. Difference theory proposes that men and women evolve within different subcultures with men expected to be more competitive and goal-orientated, and women expected to be more cooperative and people-orientated. Both these theories assume that women’s socialized speech styles make them fundamentally unsuitable for leadership. Finally discursive or performativity theory, suggests that both female and male leaders can draw equally on a linguistic repertoire of resources normatively coded masculine and feminine. However, the presence of disempowering, gendered discourses in organizations can militate against women’s access to, and performance of senior roles.By taking up performativity theory, I will argue that women can be empowered to access and perform leadership in more diverse, dynamic and challenging ways. I will present applied examples from the work of language and gender scholars such as Holmes (2006), Angouri (2011), Louise Mullany (2007) and my own (2010; 2014), to show how we can intervene to raise women’s awareness of the sociolinguistic strategies they can use, and the effects such strategies can achieve in the workplace.",
author = "Baxter, {Judith A}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
series = "Routledge Handbooks",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "401--412",
editor = "Bernadette Vine",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Baxter, JA 2018, Gender, Language and Leadership: Enabling Women Leaders. in B Vine (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace., 32, Routledge Handbooks, Routledge, New York, pp. 401-412.

Gender, Language and Leadership : Enabling Women Leaders. / Baxter, Judith A.

The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace. ed. / Bernadette Vine. New York : Routledge, 2018. p. 401-412 32 (Routledge Handbooks).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gender, Language and Leadership

T2 - Enabling Women Leaders

AU - Baxter, Judith A

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Women leaders in the workplace are a comparatively recent phenomenon, and because of their minority position, women continue to experience a range of barriers to their career progression. Many sociological, psychological and economic reasons have been explored to explain women’s lack of progress in ‘breaking the glass ceiling’, but hitherto, there has been little research exploring the possible sociolinguistic reasons, and providing practical solutions. This chapter review the range of theories which variously explain the role of language in constructing barriers for women who aspire to leadership in the workplace. Dominance theory suggests that the social nature of language constructs men as more powerful and women as less so. Difference theory proposes that men and women evolve within different subcultures with men expected to be more competitive and goal-orientated, and women expected to be more cooperative and people-orientated. Both these theories assume that women’s socialized speech styles make them fundamentally unsuitable for leadership. Finally discursive or performativity theory, suggests that both female and male leaders can draw equally on a linguistic repertoire of resources normatively coded masculine and feminine. However, the presence of disempowering, gendered discourses in organizations can militate against women’s access to, and performance of senior roles.By taking up performativity theory, I will argue that women can be empowered to access and perform leadership in more diverse, dynamic and challenging ways. I will present applied examples from the work of language and gender scholars such as Holmes (2006), Angouri (2011), Louise Mullany (2007) and my own (2010; 2014), to show how we can intervene to raise women’s awareness of the sociolinguistic strategies they can use, and the effects such strategies can achieve in the workplace.

AB - Women leaders in the workplace are a comparatively recent phenomenon, and because of their minority position, women continue to experience a range of barriers to their career progression. Many sociological, psychological and economic reasons have been explored to explain women’s lack of progress in ‘breaking the glass ceiling’, but hitherto, there has been little research exploring the possible sociolinguistic reasons, and providing practical solutions. This chapter review the range of theories which variously explain the role of language in constructing barriers for women who aspire to leadership in the workplace. Dominance theory suggests that the social nature of language constructs men as more powerful and women as less so. Difference theory proposes that men and women evolve within different subcultures with men expected to be more competitive and goal-orientated, and women expected to be more cooperative and people-orientated. Both these theories assume that women’s socialized speech styles make them fundamentally unsuitable for leadership. Finally discursive or performativity theory, suggests that both female and male leaders can draw equally on a linguistic repertoire of resources normatively coded masculine and feminine. However, the presence of disempowering, gendered discourses in organizations can militate against women’s access to, and performance of senior roles.By taking up performativity theory, I will argue that women can be empowered to access and perform leadership in more diverse, dynamic and challenging ways. I will present applied examples from the work of language and gender scholars such as Holmes (2006), Angouri (2011), Louise Mullany (2007) and my own (2010; 2014), to show how we can intervene to raise women’s awareness of the sociolinguistic strategies they can use, and the effects such strategies can achieve in the workplace.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Language-in-the-Workplace/Vine/p/book/9781138915855

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

T3 - Routledge Handbooks

SP - 401

EP - 412

BT - The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace

A2 - Vine, Bernadette

PB - Routledge

CY - New York

ER -

Baxter JA. Gender, Language and Leadership: Enabling Women Leaders. In Vine B, editor, The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace. New York: Routledge. 2018. p. 401-412. 32. (Routledge Handbooks).