“Gendering” European Security: Policy Changes, Reform Coalitions and Opposition in the OSCE

Anne Jenichen, Jutta Joachim, Andrea Schneiker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The OSCE has rarely been considered in scholarship on gender and security, even though it was one of the regional security organisations whose gender policy predated the United Nations Security Council’s call for more international attention to issues related to women, peace and security in October 2000. Based on an analysis of official OSCE documents and on semi-structured interviews, we trace the integration of gender issues in the OSCE and explore the rationale behind and the challenges associated with it. We identify two phases of gender policy change in the OSCE and show how the integration of UNSCR 1325 brought about an expansion of OSCE gender policy from an exclusive focus on “soft” security issues towards increased inclusion of gender in the area of “hard” security. Drawing on historical and feminist institutionalism, we argue that reform coalitions were crucial for the policy changes in the OSCE but that they encountered institutional and ideational barriers, which hampered implementation of the gender policy. In light of rising opposition, our analysis warns of a backlash that might jeopardise current achievements.
LanguageEnglish
JournalEuropean Security
Early online date4 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

European security
OSCE
security policy
gender policy
coalition
opposition
reform
gender
institutionalism
UNO
peace
inclusion
interview

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Security on 4th February 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660.

Funding: Folke Bernadotte Academy (Sweden)

Keywords

  • Organisation for security and co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
  • gender
  • UN security council resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325)
  • women
  • peace and security
  • historical institutionalism
  • feminist institutionalism

Cite this

@article{651f9a8df1f24503a4e213dab38761f0,
title = "“Gendering” European Security: Policy Changes, Reform Coalitions and Opposition in the OSCE",
abstract = "The OSCE has rarely been considered in scholarship on gender and security, even though it was one of the regional security organisations whose gender policy predated the United Nations Security Council’s call for more international attention to issues related to women, peace and security in October 2000. Based on an analysis of official OSCE documents and on semi-structured interviews, we trace the integration of gender issues in the OSCE and explore the rationale behind and the challenges associated with it. We identify two phases of gender policy change in the OSCE and show how the integration of UNSCR 1325 brought about an expansion of OSCE gender policy from an exclusive focus on “soft” security issues towards increased inclusion of gender in the area of “hard” security. Drawing on historical and feminist institutionalism, we argue that reform coalitions were crucial for the policy changes in the OSCE but that they encountered institutional and ideational barriers, which hampered implementation of the gender policy. In light of rising opposition, our analysis warns of a backlash that might jeopardise current achievements.",
keywords = "Organisation for security and co-operation in Europe (OSCE), gender, UN security council resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), women, peace and security, historical institutionalism, feminist institutionalism",
author = "Anne Jenichen and Jutta Joachim and Andrea Schneiker",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Security on 4th February 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660. Funding: Folke Bernadotte Academy (Sweden)",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660",
language = "English",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",

}

“Gendering” European Security : Policy Changes, Reform Coalitions and Opposition in the OSCE. / Jenichen, Anne; Joachim, Jutta; Schneiker, Andrea.

In: European Security, 04.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Gendering” European Security

T2 - European Security

AU - Jenichen, Anne

AU - Joachim, Jutta

AU - Schneiker, Andrea

N1 - © 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Security on 4th February 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660. Funding: Folke Bernadotte Academy (Sweden)

PY - 2018/2/4

Y1 - 2018/2/4

N2 - The OSCE has rarely been considered in scholarship on gender and security, even though it was one of the regional security organisations whose gender policy predated the United Nations Security Council’s call for more international attention to issues related to women, peace and security in October 2000. Based on an analysis of official OSCE documents and on semi-structured interviews, we trace the integration of gender issues in the OSCE and explore the rationale behind and the challenges associated with it. We identify two phases of gender policy change in the OSCE and show how the integration of UNSCR 1325 brought about an expansion of OSCE gender policy from an exclusive focus on “soft” security issues towards increased inclusion of gender in the area of “hard” security. Drawing on historical and feminist institutionalism, we argue that reform coalitions were crucial for the policy changes in the OSCE but that they encountered institutional and ideational barriers, which hampered implementation of the gender policy. In light of rising opposition, our analysis warns of a backlash that might jeopardise current achievements.

AB - The OSCE has rarely been considered in scholarship on gender and security, even though it was one of the regional security organisations whose gender policy predated the United Nations Security Council’s call for more international attention to issues related to women, peace and security in October 2000. Based on an analysis of official OSCE documents and on semi-structured interviews, we trace the integration of gender issues in the OSCE and explore the rationale behind and the challenges associated with it. We identify two phases of gender policy change in the OSCE and show how the integration of UNSCR 1325 brought about an expansion of OSCE gender policy from an exclusive focus on “soft” security issues towards increased inclusion of gender in the area of “hard” security. Drawing on historical and feminist institutionalism, we argue that reform coalitions were crucial for the policy changes in the OSCE but that they encountered institutional and ideational barriers, which hampered implementation of the gender policy. In light of rising opposition, our analysis warns of a backlash that might jeopardise current achievements.

KW - Organisation for security and co-operation in Europe (OSCE)

KW - gender

KW - UN security council resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325)

KW - women

KW - peace and security

KW - historical institutionalism

KW - feminist institutionalism

U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660

DO - 10.1080/09662839.2018.1433660

M3 - Article

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

ER -