Abstract
Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) can mimic the complex architecture of trabecular bone while facilitating controlled fluid transport and cellular colonisation. This study integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD), laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), and in vitro cell assays to evaluate the structure-function relationship of four Ti6Al4V TPMS scaffolds informed by Schwartz Primitive (SSC), Lidinoid (LSC), Gyroid (GSC), and Diamond (DSC) featuring 60% porosity. CFD simulations at inlet velocities ranging from 0.001 to 0.01 m/s revealed architecture-specific permeability ranging from 1.89 × 10 −9 m 2 (DSC) to 4.29 × 10 −9 m 2 (SSC) at low flow rates, with a consistent inverse relationship between flow velocity and permeability (R 2 > 0.99). Mid-plane velocity fields highlighted scaffold-specific vortex formations and nutrient mixing dynamics, with SSC exhibiting pronounced swirling zones, promoting fluid homogenisation. In vitro cytocompatibility assessed via MTT assay on U-2OS osteosarcoma cells showed >85% viability across all geometries after 24 h and >88% after 7 days, with the LSC scaffold exhibiting the most consistent viability (101.8 ± 7.7%) and SSC showing significant improvement over time (87.2 ± 3.3% to 121.4 ± 6.2%, p < 0.015). Immunofluorescence imaging confirmed cell attachment across all architectures, with GSC and DSC supporting uniform cytoskeletal spreading and enhanced cell-pore integration. Degradation studies in PBS at 37 °C showed that DSC scaffolds underwent the highest mass loss (4.42% at day 7), correlating with their larger surface area, while pH monitoring suggested early ion release followed by buffering over time. These results demonstrate that scaffold topology significantly impacts permeability, degradation, and biological performance with SSC and GSC emerging as promising 3D printed microenvironments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100436 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices |
| Volume | 30 |
| Early online date | 18 Feb 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the University of Wolverhampton's Centre for Engineering Innovation and Research (CEIR) and the Elite Centre for Manufacturing Skills (ECMS), whose infrastructure and expertise enabled the successful execution of this study. Special thanks are extended to EOS GmbH for the provision of high-quality Ti6Al4V feedstock and to nTopology Inc. for access to their advanced computational design platform. We would also like to thank the technical team at the Additive Manufacturing of Functional Materials (AMFM) research group for their precision in scaffold fabrication and post-processing, and the Biomedical Research Unit for assistance with cytocompatibility assays and imaging.
| Funders |
|---|
| University of Wolverhampton |
| CEIR |
| Elite Centre for Manufacturing Skills |
Keywords
- Additive manufacturing
- Biocompatibility
- Bone tissue engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
- Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Geometry driven fluid dynamics and cytocompatibility of 3D printed TPMS bone scaffolds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver