Getting involved: The extent and impact of patient and public involvement in the Swedish health system

Mio Fredriksson, Jonathan Q Tritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as beneficial for individuals and for the health system. However, little is known about the extent of involvement, or of its impact. Based on data from Sweden, we show that apart from voting in regional elections (76%), more people reported involvement as individual patients (23%) than part of collective activities (5%) or activities relating to a citizen perspective (4%). There was no correlation between how many people participated and the estimated impact - which was generally low. More extensive involvement is thus not linked to the potential to influence decisions. We argue that to achieve the benefits associated with PPI it is crucial to understand more about people's motivation for being involved and what underlies low estimates of impact. This requires a more systematic approach to involvement, how it is evaluated and its results communicated to participants and the society. We also argue that a future challenge for the Swedish health system, and for other similar health systems, is to support long-term collective involvement in the midst of growing individualization of health services and involvement opportunities primarily intended for patients.

LanguageEnglish
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Early online date3 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2019

Fingerprint

Health
Politics
Sweden
Health Services

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available via Cambridge Journals Online at http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311900015X

Keywords

  • Involvement impact
  • Sweden
  • participation
  • patient and public involvement

Cite this

@article{f6db4a8a353148c29faca473db304d5c,
title = "Getting involved: The extent and impact of patient and public involvement in the Swedish health system",
abstract = "Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as beneficial for individuals and for the health system. However, little is known about the extent of involvement, or of its impact. Based on data from Sweden, we show that apart from voting in regional elections (76{\%}), more people reported involvement as individual patients (23{\%}) than part of collective activities (5{\%}) or activities relating to a citizen perspective (4{\%}). There was no correlation between how many people participated and the estimated impact - which was generally low. More extensive involvement is thus not linked to the potential to influence decisions. We argue that to achieve the benefits associated with PPI it is crucial to understand more about people's motivation for being involved and what underlies low estimates of impact. This requires a more systematic approach to involvement, how it is evaluated and its results communicated to participants and the society. We also argue that a future challenge for the Swedish health system, and for other similar health systems, is to support long-term collective involvement in the midst of growing individualization of health services and involvement opportunities primarily intended for patients.",
keywords = "Involvement impact, Sweden, participation, patient and public involvement",
author = "Mio Fredriksson and Tritter, {Jonathan Q}",
note = "The final publication is available via Cambridge Journals Online at http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311900015X",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S174413311900015X",
language = "English",

}

Getting involved : The extent and impact of patient and public involvement in the Swedish health system. / Fredriksson, Mio; Tritter, Jonathan Q.

03.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting involved

T2 - The extent and impact of patient and public involvement in the Swedish health system

AU - Fredriksson, Mio

AU - Tritter, Jonathan Q

N1 - The final publication is available via Cambridge Journals Online at http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413311900015X

PY - 2019/5/3

Y1 - 2019/5/3

N2 - Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as beneficial for individuals and for the health system. However, little is known about the extent of involvement, or of its impact. Based on data from Sweden, we show that apart from voting in regional elections (76%), more people reported involvement as individual patients (23%) than part of collective activities (5%) or activities relating to a citizen perspective (4%). There was no correlation between how many people participated and the estimated impact - which was generally low. More extensive involvement is thus not linked to the potential to influence decisions. We argue that to achieve the benefits associated with PPI it is crucial to understand more about people's motivation for being involved and what underlies low estimates of impact. This requires a more systematic approach to involvement, how it is evaluated and its results communicated to participants and the society. We also argue that a future challenge for the Swedish health system, and for other similar health systems, is to support long-term collective involvement in the midst of growing individualization of health services and involvement opportunities primarily intended for patients.

AB - Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as beneficial for individuals and for the health system. However, little is known about the extent of involvement, or of its impact. Based on data from Sweden, we show that apart from voting in regional elections (76%), more people reported involvement as individual patients (23%) than part of collective activities (5%) or activities relating to a citizen perspective (4%). There was no correlation between how many people participated and the estimated impact - which was generally low. More extensive involvement is thus not linked to the potential to influence decisions. We argue that to achieve the benefits associated with PPI it is crucial to understand more about people's motivation for being involved and what underlies low estimates of impact. This requires a more systematic approach to involvement, how it is evaluated and its results communicated to participants and the society. We also argue that a future challenge for the Swedish health system, and for other similar health systems, is to support long-term collective involvement in the midst of growing individualization of health services and involvement opportunities primarily intended for patients.

KW - Involvement impact

KW - Sweden

KW - participation

KW - patient and public involvement

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/health-economics-policy-and-law/article/getting-involved-the-extent-and-impact-of-patient-and-public-involvement-in-the-swedish-health-system/6E0D9341A98165D8A9E6ACBF92EA4F70

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065309188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S174413311900015X

DO - 10.1017/S174413311900015X

M3 - Article

ER -