Abstract
This year, an independent review of whisleblowing in the NHS made recommendations as to how whistleblowers could be given greater protection. The review, chaired by Sir Robert Francis, intended to improve the quality of patient care and safety in the health service. But with many practitioners remaining unregulated, there are unanswered questions as to how reports of mistakes can be properly investigated and the necessary action taken against incompetent or negligent practitioners. Amanda Casey, Chair of the Registration Council for Clinical Physiologists, makes the case for regulation of professionals whose work poses potential risks to patients and can place healthcare managers in an invidious position.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 206-207 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | British Journal of Healthcare Management |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 11 May 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Francis review
- managers
- regulation
- whistleblowers
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Giving whistleblowers greater protection: improving quality of care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver