Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice

James S. Wolffsohn, Antonio Calossi, Pauline Cho, Kate Gifford, Lyndon Jones, Ming Li, Cesar Lipener, Nicola Logan, Florence Malet, Sofia Matos, José Manuel González-Méijome, Jason J. Nichols, Janis B. Orr, Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido, Tania Schaefer, Nilesh Thite, Eef van der Worp, Madara Zvirgzdina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myopia is a global public health issue; however, no information exists as to how potential myopia retardation strategies are being adopted globally.

METHODS: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in six languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.

RESULTS: Of the 971 respondents, concern was higher (median 9/10) in Asia than in any other continent (7/10, p<0.001) and they considered themselves more active in implementing myopia control strategies (8/10) than Australasia and Europe (7/10), with North (4/10) and South America (5/10) being least proactive (p<0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by increased time outdoors and pharmaceutical approaches, with under-correction and single vision spectacles felt to be the least effective (p<0.05). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall most practitioners 67.5 (±37.8)% prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients. The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (35.6%), inadequate information (33.3%) and the unpredictability of outcomes (28.2%).

CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of practitioners' awareness of the efficacy of myopia control techniques, the vast majority still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. In view of the increasing prevalence of myopia and existing evidence for interventions to slow myopia progression, clear guidelines for myopia management need to be established.

LanguageEnglish
Pages106-116
Number of pages11
JournalContact Lens and Anterior Eye
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date16 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Myopia
Australasia
South America
Contact Lenses
Internet
Language
Public Health
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis

Bibliographical note

© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Global
  • Myopia control
  • Myopia management
  • Myopia progression
  • Orthokeratology

Cite this

Wolffsohn, James S. ; Calossi, Antonio ; Cho, Pauline ; Gifford, Kate ; Jones, Lyndon ; Li, Ming ; Lipener, Cesar ; Logan, Nicola ; Malet, Florence ; Matos, Sofia ; González-Méijome, José Manuel ; Nichols, Jason J. ; Orr, Janis B. ; Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto ; Schaefer, Tania ; Thite, Nilesh ; van der Worp, Eef ; Zvirgzdina, Madara. / Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice. In: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2016 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 106-116.
@article{f4cfca44bf47425b8adb842dac1e5598,
title = "Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Myopia is a global public health issue; however, no information exists as to how potential myopia retardation strategies are being adopted globally.METHODS: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in six languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.RESULTS: Of the 971 respondents, concern was higher (median 9/10) in Asia than in any other continent (7/10, p<0.001) and they considered themselves more active in implementing myopia control strategies (8/10) than Australasia and Europe (7/10), with North (4/10) and South America (5/10) being least proactive (p<0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by increased time outdoors and pharmaceutical approaches, with under-correction and single vision spectacles felt to be the least effective (p<0.05). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall most practitioners 67.5 (±37.8){\%} prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients. The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (35.6{\%}), inadequate information (33.3{\%}) and the unpredictability of outcomes (28.2{\%}).CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of practitioners' awareness of the efficacy of myopia control techniques, the vast majority still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. In view of the increasing prevalence of myopia and existing evidence for interventions to slow myopia progression, clear guidelines for myopia management need to be established.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Global, Myopia control, Myopia management, Myopia progression, Orthokeratology",
author = "Wolffsohn, {James S.} and Antonio Calossi and Pauline Cho and Kate Gifford and Lyndon Jones and Ming Li and Cesar Lipener and Nicola Logan and Florence Malet and Sofia Matos and Gonz{\'a}lez-M{\'e}ijome, {Jos{\'e} Manuel} and Nichols, {Jason J.} and Orr, {Janis B.} and Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido and Tania Schaefer and Nilesh Thite and {van der Worp}, Eef and Madara Zvirgzdina",
note = "{\circledC} 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.clae.2016.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "106--116",
journal = "Contact Lens and Anterior Eye",
issn = "1367-0484",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Wolffsohn, JS, Calossi, A, Cho, P, Gifford, K, Jones, L, Li, M, Lipener, C, Logan, N, Malet, F, Matos, S, González-Méijome, JM, Nichols, JJ, Orr, JB, Santodomingo-Rubido, J, Schaefer, T, Thite, N, van der Worp, E & Zvirgzdina, M 2016, 'Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice' Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2016.02.005

Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice. / Wolffsohn, James S.; Calossi, Antonio; Cho, Pauline; Gifford, Kate; Jones, Lyndon; Li, Ming; Lipener, Cesar; Logan, Nicola; Malet, Florence; Matos, Sofia; González-Méijome, José Manuel; Nichols, Jason J.; Orr, Janis B.; Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto; Schaefer, Tania; Thite, Nilesh; van der Worp, Eef; Zvirgzdina, Madara.

In: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Vol. 39, No. 2, 04.2016, p. 106-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice

AU - Wolffsohn, James S.

AU - Calossi, Antonio

AU - Cho, Pauline

AU - Gifford, Kate

AU - Jones, Lyndon

AU - Li, Ming

AU - Lipener, Cesar

AU - Logan, Nicola

AU - Malet, Florence

AU - Matos, Sofia

AU - González-Méijome, José Manuel

AU - Nichols, Jason J.

AU - Orr, Janis B.

AU - Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto

AU - Schaefer, Tania

AU - Thite, Nilesh

AU - van der Worp, Eef

AU - Zvirgzdina, Madara

N1 - © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - PURPOSE: Myopia is a global public health issue; however, no information exists as to how potential myopia retardation strategies are being adopted globally.METHODS: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in six languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.RESULTS: Of the 971 respondents, concern was higher (median 9/10) in Asia than in any other continent (7/10, p<0.001) and they considered themselves more active in implementing myopia control strategies (8/10) than Australasia and Europe (7/10), with North (4/10) and South America (5/10) being least proactive (p<0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by increased time outdoors and pharmaceutical approaches, with under-correction and single vision spectacles felt to be the least effective (p<0.05). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall most practitioners 67.5 (±37.8)% prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients. The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (35.6%), inadequate information (33.3%) and the unpredictability of outcomes (28.2%).CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of practitioners' awareness of the efficacy of myopia control techniques, the vast majority still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. In view of the increasing prevalence of myopia and existing evidence for interventions to slow myopia progression, clear guidelines for myopia management need to be established.

AB - PURPOSE: Myopia is a global public health issue; however, no information exists as to how potential myopia retardation strategies are being adopted globally.METHODS: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in six languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy and adoption of available strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.RESULTS: Of the 971 respondents, concern was higher (median 9/10) in Asia than in any other continent (7/10, p<0.001) and they considered themselves more active in implementing myopia control strategies (8/10) than Australasia and Europe (7/10), with North (4/10) and South America (5/10) being least proactive (p<0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by increased time outdoors and pharmaceutical approaches, with under-correction and single vision spectacles felt to be the least effective (p<0.05). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall most practitioners 67.5 (±37.8)% prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients. The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (35.6%), inadequate information (33.3%) and the unpredictability of outcomes (28.2%).CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of practitioners' awareness of the efficacy of myopia control techniques, the vast majority still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. In view of the increasing prevalence of myopia and existing evidence for interventions to slow myopia progression, clear guidelines for myopia management need to be established.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Global

KW - Myopia control

KW - Myopia management

KW - Myopia progression

KW - Orthokeratology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959545372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17036/3c46045c-09a5-4d4c-b372-fc228dce80fa

U2 - 10.1016/j.clae.2016.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.clae.2016.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 106

EP - 116

JO - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

T2 - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

JF - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

SN - 1367-0484

IS - 2

ER -