TY - JOUR
T1 - Group decision making in hidden profile situations
T2 - Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality
AU - Schulz-Hardt, Stefan
AU - Brodbeck, Felix C.
AU - Mojzisch, Andreas
AU - Kerschreiter, Rudolf
AU - Frey, Dieter
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - The effect of diversity in individual prediscussion preferences on group decision quality was examined in an experiment in which 135 three-person groups worked on a personnel selection case with 4 alternatives. The information distribution among group members constituted a hidden profile (i.e., the correct solution was not identifiable on the basis of the members' individual information and could be detected only by pooling and integrating the members' unique information). Whereas groups with homogeneous suboptimal prediscussion preferences (no dissent) hardly ever solved the hidden profile, solution rates were significantly higher in groups with prediscussion dissent, even if none of these individual prediscussion preferences were correct. If dissent came from a proponent of the correct solution, solution rates were even higher than in dissent groups without such a proponent. The magnitude of dissent (i.e., minority dissent or full diversity of individual preferences) did not affect decision quality. The beneficial effect of dissent on group decision quality was mediated primarily by greater discussion intensity and to some extent also by less discussion bias in dissent groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - The effect of diversity in individual prediscussion preferences on group decision quality was examined in an experiment in which 135 three-person groups worked on a personnel selection case with 4 alternatives. The information distribution among group members constituted a hidden profile (i.e., the correct solution was not identifiable on the basis of the members' individual information and could be detected only by pooling and integrating the members' unique information). Whereas groups with homogeneous suboptimal prediscussion preferences (no dissent) hardly ever solved the hidden profile, solution rates were significantly higher in groups with prediscussion dissent, even if none of these individual prediscussion preferences were correct. If dissent came from a proponent of the correct solution, solution rates were even higher than in dissent groups without such a proponent. The magnitude of dissent (i.e., minority dissent or full diversity of individual preferences) did not affect decision quality. The beneficial effect of dissent on group decision quality was mediated primarily by greater discussion intensity and to some extent also by less discussion bias in dissent groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - Dissent
KW - Group decision making
KW - Hidden profile
KW - Information pooling
KW - Minority influence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845243955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-21634-007?doi=1
U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080
M3 - Article
C2 - 17144766
AN - SCOPUS:33845243955
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 91
SP - 1080
EP - 1093
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 6
ER -