Abstract
Investigating the recent direct action campaigns against genetically modified crops in France and the United Kingdom, the authors set out to understand how contrasting judicial systems and cultures affect the way that activists choose to commit ostensibly illegal actions and how they negotiate the trade-offs between effectiveness and public accountability. The authors find evidence that prosecution outcomes across different judicial systems are consistent and relatively predictable and consequently argue that the concept of a “judicial opportunity structure” is useful for developing scholars’ understanding of social movement trajectories. The authors also find that these differential judicial opportunities cannot adequately account for the tactical choices made by activists with respect to the staging of covert or overt direct action; rather, explanations of tactical choice are better accounted for by movement ideas, cultures, and traditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-29 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 18 Apr 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2014 |