Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Realist Evaluation from the RESOLVE Study

  • Jo Howe
  • , Maura MacPhee
  • , Hafsah Habib
  • , Geoff Wong
  • , Sherifat Oduola
  • , Annabel E.L. Walsh
  • , Suzanne Higgs
  • , Katherine Allen
  • , Alex Kenny
  • , Justine Lovell
  • , Amy L. Ahern
  • , Max Carlish
  • , Rachel Upthegrove
  • , Gurkiran Birdi
  • , Ian D. Maidment*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Weight gain is a common, distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication prescribed for people with severe mental illness. National guidance for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) encourages early intervention and physical health monitoring; healthcare professionals (HCPs) often struggle to implement these recommendations in routine care.

Aims:
To explore how HCPs understand and respond to AIWG for patients.

Method:
This realist evaluation, part of the RESOLVE project, builds on a realist synthesis. Thirty HCPs participated in realist interviews. A programme theory with nine context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs) was generated, explaining how HCPs perceive non-pharmacological care provision for patients with AIWG. Clinical and lived experience stakeholders reviewed and refined the theory and CMOCs.

Results:
The nine CMOCs spanned three areas: (a) systemic and professional challenges; (b) strategies to enhance individualised and meaningful support; and (c) the role and limitations of non-professional support. HCPs described how lack of training, siloed services and system-level constraints limited their ability to offer integrated care. They highlighted the importance of relational continuity, early and tailored conversations, and alignment with patients’ values and motivations. Peer and family support were valued, but structural barriers undermined their consistent implementation.

Conclusions:
AIWG was experienced as compromising professional values for HCPs working in mental health settings. Person-centred care was often undermined by fragmented systems, role ambiguity and insufficient training. These issues require investment in professional development, structural integration, and relationship-based approaches that support timely, collaborative action.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere236
Number of pages8
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume12
Issue number5
Early online date10 Sept 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sept 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

Data Access Statement

Owing to the sensitive nature of the qualitative data generated, data sharing would not be appropriate.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIHR (131871). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Realist Evaluation from the RESOLVE Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this