Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government

Suzana Grubnic, Margaret Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider hierarchical control as a mode of governance, and analyses the extent of control exhibited by central government over local government through the best value (BV) and comprehensive performance assessment (CPA) performance regimes.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper utilises Ouchi's framework and, specifically, his articulation of bureaucratic or hierarchical control in the move towards achievement of organisational objectives. Hierarchical control may be inferred from the extent of “command and control” by Central Government, use of rewards and sanctions, and alignment to government priorities and discrimination of performance.
Findings – CPA represents a more sophisticated performance regime than BV in the governance of local authorities by central government. In comparison to BV, CPA involved less scope for dialogue with local government prior to introduction, closer inspection of and direction of support toward poorer performing authorities, and more alignment to government priorities in the weightings attached to service blocks.
Originality/value - The paper focuses upon the hierarchic/bureaucratic mode of governance as articulated by Ouchi and expands on this mode in order to analyse shifts in performance regimes in the public sector.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-455
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

performance assessment
local government
regime
performance
sanction
public sector
governance
Values
methodology
weighting
central government
reward
discrimination
dialogue
alignment

Keywords

  • performance management
  • local government
  • governance
  • United Kingdom

Cite this

Grubnic, Suzana ; Woods, Margaret. / Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government. In: International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2009 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 445-455.
@article{92b9e61e364d4f61a1e8fb3a52423a8b,
title = "Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider hierarchical control as a mode of governance, and analyses the extent of control exhibited by central government over local government through the best value (BV) and comprehensive performance assessment (CPA) performance regimes.Design/methodology/approach – This paper utilises Ouchi's framework and, specifically, his articulation of bureaucratic or hierarchical control in the move towards achievement of organisational objectives. Hierarchical control may be inferred from the extent of “command and control” by Central Government, use of rewards and sanctions, and alignment to government priorities and discrimination of performance.Findings – CPA represents a more sophisticated performance regime than BV in the governance of local authorities by central government. In comparison to BV, CPA involved less scope for dialogue with local government prior to introduction, closer inspection of and direction of support toward poorer performing authorities, and more alignment to government priorities in the weightings attached to service blocks.Originality/value - The paper focuses upon the hierarchic/bureaucratic mode of governance as articulated by Ouchi and expands on this mode in order to analyse shifts in performance regimes in the public sector.",
keywords = "performance management, local government, governance, United Kingdom",
author = "Suzana Grubnic and Margaret Woods",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/09513550910972527",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "445--455",
journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
issn = "0951-3558",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government. / Grubnic, Suzana; Woods, Margaret.

In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 22, No. 5, 10.07.2009, p. 445-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government

AU - Grubnic, Suzana

AU - Woods, Margaret

PY - 2009/7/10

Y1 - 2009/7/10

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider hierarchical control as a mode of governance, and analyses the extent of control exhibited by central government over local government through the best value (BV) and comprehensive performance assessment (CPA) performance regimes.Design/methodology/approach – This paper utilises Ouchi's framework and, specifically, his articulation of bureaucratic or hierarchical control in the move towards achievement of organisational objectives. Hierarchical control may be inferred from the extent of “command and control” by Central Government, use of rewards and sanctions, and alignment to government priorities and discrimination of performance.Findings – CPA represents a more sophisticated performance regime than BV in the governance of local authorities by central government. In comparison to BV, CPA involved less scope for dialogue with local government prior to introduction, closer inspection of and direction of support toward poorer performing authorities, and more alignment to government priorities in the weightings attached to service blocks.Originality/value - The paper focuses upon the hierarchic/bureaucratic mode of governance as articulated by Ouchi and expands on this mode in order to analyse shifts in performance regimes in the public sector.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider hierarchical control as a mode of governance, and analyses the extent of control exhibited by central government over local government through the best value (BV) and comprehensive performance assessment (CPA) performance regimes.Design/methodology/approach – This paper utilises Ouchi's framework and, specifically, his articulation of bureaucratic or hierarchical control in the move towards achievement of organisational objectives. Hierarchical control may be inferred from the extent of “command and control” by Central Government, use of rewards and sanctions, and alignment to government priorities and discrimination of performance.Findings – CPA represents a more sophisticated performance regime than BV in the governance of local authorities by central government. In comparison to BV, CPA involved less scope for dialogue with local government prior to introduction, closer inspection of and direction of support toward poorer performing authorities, and more alignment to government priorities in the weightings attached to service blocks.Originality/value - The paper focuses upon the hierarchic/bureaucratic mode of governance as articulated by Ouchi and expands on this mode in order to analyse shifts in performance regimes in the public sector.

KW - performance management

KW - local government

KW - governance

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349603180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/09513550910972527?queryID=36%2F10533373

U2 - 10.1108/09513550910972527

DO - 10.1108/09513550910972527

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 445

EP - 455

JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

SN - 0951-3558

IS - 5

ER -