Abstract
This article discusses property rights, corporate governance frameworks and privatisation outcomes in the Central–Eastern Europe and Central Asia (CEECA) region. We argue that while CEECA still suffers from deficient ‘higher order’ institutions, this is not attracting sufficient attention from international institutions like EBRD and the World Bank, which focus on ‘lower order’ indicators. We discuss factors that may alleviate the negative impact of the weakness in institutional environment and argue for the pecking order of privatisation, where equivalent privatisation is given a priority but speed is not compromised.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 399-423 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Post-Communist Economies |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hierarchy of governance institutions and the pecking order of privatisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver