TY - JOUR
T1 - How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
AU - Dixon-Woods, Mary
AU - Bonas, Sheila
AU - Booth, Andrew
AU - Jones, David R.
AU - Miller, Tina
AU - Shaw, Rachel L.
AU - Smith, Jonathan A.
AU - Sutton, Alex
AU - Young, Bridget
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the evidence-based practice and policy movement. Qualitative research has traditionally been excluded from systematic reviews, and much effort is now being invested in resolving the daunting methodological and epistemological challenges associated with trying to move towards more inclusive forms of review. We describe our experiences, as a very diverse multidisciplinary group, in attempting to incorporate qualitative research in a systematic review of support for breastfeeding. We show how every stage of the review process, from asking the review question through to searching for and sampling the evidence, appraising the evidence and producing a synthesis, provoked profound questions about whether a review that includes qualitative research can remain consistent with the frame offered by current systematic review methodology. We conclude that more debate and dialogue between the different communities that wish to develop review methodology is needed, and that attempts to impose dominant views about the appropriate means of conducting reviews of qualitative research should be resisted so that innovation can be fostered. Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications.
AB - Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the evidence-based practice and policy movement. Qualitative research has traditionally been excluded from systematic reviews, and much effort is now being invested in resolving the daunting methodological and epistemological challenges associated with trying to move towards more inclusive forms of review. We describe our experiences, as a very diverse multidisciplinary group, in attempting to incorporate qualitative research in a systematic review of support for breastfeeding. We show how every stage of the review process, from asking the review question through to searching for and sampling the evidence, appraising the evidence and producing a synthesis, provoked profound questions about whether a review that includes qualitative research can remain consistent with the frame offered by current systematic review methodology. We conclude that more debate and dialogue between the different communities that wish to develop review methodology is needed, and that attempts to impose dominant views about the appropriate means of conducting reviews of qualitative research should be resisted so that innovation can be fostered. Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications.
KW - Evidence-based policy and practice
KW - Quality appraisal
KW - Quantitative and qualitative synthesis
KW - Searching techniques
KW - Systematic reviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646238979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://qrj.sagepub.com/content/6/1/27
U2 - 10.1177/1468794106058867
DO - 10.1177/1468794106058867
M3 - Article
SN - 1468-7941
VL - 6
SP - 27
EP - 44
JO - Qualitative Research
JF - Qualitative Research
IS - 1
ER -