How does knowledge relate to political action?

Nico Stehr*, Reiner Grundmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the relation between knowledge and political action, focusing on knowledge claims stemming from science that at the same time have relevance in a policy context. In so doing, we will revisit some well-known and some lesser known approaches, such as C.P. Snow's thesis of the two cultures and Mannheim's conceptualization of theory and practice. We arrive at a distinction between knowledge for practice and practical knowledge, which we briefly apply to the case of climate change science and policy. We state as our thesis that policy is ever more reliant on knowledge, but science can deliver ever less certainty. Political decisions and programs have to recognize this fact, either implicitly or explicitly. This creates a paradox that is normally resolved through the political decision and not the dissemination of "truth" in the sense of uncontested knowledge. We use the case of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as an example.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-44
Number of pages16
JournalInnovation
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date22 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

political action
Climate change
political decision
climate change
Snow
science
political program
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
snow
knowledge
policy
decision
thesis

Keywords

  • climate change
  • decision-making
  • knowledge
  • policy

Cite this

Stehr, Nico ; Grundmann, Reiner. / How does knowledge relate to political action?. In: Innovation. 2012 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 29-44.
@article{9ad5009828af40478e7d242b80f57656,
title = "How does knowledge relate to political action?",
abstract = "In this paper we investigate the relation between knowledge and political action, focusing on knowledge claims stemming from science that at the same time have relevance in a policy context. In so doing, we will revisit some well-known and some lesser known approaches, such as C.P. Snow's thesis of the two cultures and Mannheim's conceptualization of theory and practice. We arrive at a distinction between knowledge for practice and practical knowledge, which we briefly apply to the case of climate change science and policy. We state as our thesis that policy is ever more reliant on knowledge, but science can deliver ever less certainty. Political decisions and programs have to recognize this fact, either implicitly or explicitly. This creates a paradox that is normally resolved through the political decision and not the dissemination of {"}truth{"} in the sense of uncontested knowledge. We use the case of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as an example.",
keywords = "climate change, decision-making, knowledge, policy",
author = "Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/13511610.2012.655572",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "29--44",
journal = "Innovation",
issn = "1351-1610",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

How does knowledge relate to political action? / Stehr, Nico; Grundmann, Reiner.

In: Innovation, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2012, p. 29-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does knowledge relate to political action?

AU - Stehr, Nico

AU - Grundmann, Reiner

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this paper we investigate the relation between knowledge and political action, focusing on knowledge claims stemming from science that at the same time have relevance in a policy context. In so doing, we will revisit some well-known and some lesser known approaches, such as C.P. Snow's thesis of the two cultures and Mannheim's conceptualization of theory and practice. We arrive at a distinction between knowledge for practice and practical knowledge, which we briefly apply to the case of climate change science and policy. We state as our thesis that policy is ever more reliant on knowledge, but science can deliver ever less certainty. Political decisions and programs have to recognize this fact, either implicitly or explicitly. This creates a paradox that is normally resolved through the political decision and not the dissemination of "truth" in the sense of uncontested knowledge. We use the case of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as an example.

AB - In this paper we investigate the relation between knowledge and political action, focusing on knowledge claims stemming from science that at the same time have relevance in a policy context. In so doing, we will revisit some well-known and some lesser known approaches, such as C.P. Snow's thesis of the two cultures and Mannheim's conceptualization of theory and practice. We arrive at a distinction between knowledge for practice and practical knowledge, which we briefly apply to the case of climate change science and policy. We state as our thesis that policy is ever more reliant on knowledge, but science can deliver ever less certainty. Political decisions and programs have to recognize this fact, either implicitly or explicitly. This creates a paradox that is normally resolved through the political decision and not the dissemination of "truth" in the sense of uncontested knowledge. We use the case of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as an example.

KW - climate change

KW - decision-making

KW - knowledge

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858430742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13511610.2012.655572

U2 - 10.1080/13511610.2012.655572

DO - 10.1080/13511610.2012.655572

M3 - Special issue

AN - SCOPUS:84858430742

VL - 25

SP - 29

EP - 44

JO - Innovation

JF - Innovation

SN - 1351-1610

IS - 1

ER -