How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion

Simon Bell*, Dan Cornford, Lucy Bastin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The UK is home to a dense network of Citizen Weather Stations (CWS) primarily set up by members of the public. The majority of these stations record air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation, amongst other variables, at sub-hourly intervals. This high resolution network could have benefits in many applications, but only if the data quality is well characterised. Here we present results from an intercomparison field study, in which popular CWS models were tested against Met Office standard equipment. The study identifies some common instrumental biases and their dependencies, which will help us to quantify and correct such biases from the CWS network.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-84
Number of pages10
JournalWeather
Volume70
Issue number3
Early online date3 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

weather station
data quality
relative humidity
air temperature
citizen
opinion

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bell, S., Cornford, D., & Bastin, L. (2015). How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. Weather, 70(3), 75-84., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Funding: EPSRC CASE award (10002388)

Keywords

  • amateur
  • quality
  • bias
  • uncertainty
  • hobbyist
  • user-contributed
  • volunteered

Cite this

Bell, Simon ; Cornford, Dan ; Bastin, Lucy. / How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. In: Weather. 2015 ; Vol. 70, No. 3. pp. 75-84.
@article{2659b123570f4b0f9aa5bb17050c4c8b,
title = "How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion",
abstract = "The UK is home to a dense network of Citizen Weather Stations (CWS) primarily set up by members of the public. The majority of these stations record air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation, amongst other variables, at sub-hourly intervals. This high resolution network could have benefits in many applications, but only if the data quality is well characterised. Here we present results from an intercomparison field study, in which popular CWS models were tested against Met Office standard equipment. The study identifies some common instrumental biases and their dependencies, which will help us to quantify and correct such biases from the CWS network.",
keywords = "amateur, quality, bias, uncertainty, hobbyist, user-contributed, volunteered",
author = "Simon Bell and Dan Cornford and Lucy Bastin",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bell, S., Cornford, D., & Bastin, L. (2015). How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. Weather, 70(3), 75-84., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. Funding: EPSRC CASE award (10002388)",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/wea.2316",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "75--84",
journal = "Weather",
issn = "0043-1656",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. / Bell, Simon; Cornford, Dan; Bastin, Lucy.

In: Weather, Vol. 70, No. 3, 03.2015, p. 75-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion

AU - Bell, Simon

AU - Cornford, Dan

AU - Bastin, Lucy

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bell, S., Cornford, D., & Bastin, L. (2015). How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. Weather, 70(3), 75-84., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving. Funding: EPSRC CASE award (10002388)

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - The UK is home to a dense network of Citizen Weather Stations (CWS) primarily set up by members of the public. The majority of these stations record air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation, amongst other variables, at sub-hourly intervals. This high resolution network could have benefits in many applications, but only if the data quality is well characterised. Here we present results from an intercomparison field study, in which popular CWS models were tested against Met Office standard equipment. The study identifies some common instrumental biases and their dependencies, which will help us to quantify and correct such biases from the CWS network.

AB - The UK is home to a dense network of Citizen Weather Stations (CWS) primarily set up by members of the public. The majority of these stations record air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation, amongst other variables, at sub-hourly intervals. This high resolution network could have benefits in many applications, but only if the data quality is well characterised. Here we present results from an intercomparison field study, in which popular CWS models were tested against Met Office standard equipment. The study identifies some common instrumental biases and their dependencies, which will help us to quantify and correct such biases from the CWS network.

KW - amateur

KW - quality

KW - bias

KW - uncertainty

KW - hobbyist

KW - user-contributed

KW - volunteered

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923768486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wea.2316

DO - 10.1002/wea.2316

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923768486

VL - 70

SP - 75

EP - 84

JO - Weather

JF - Weather

SN - 0043-1656

IS - 3

ER -