Abstract
In ordinary computer programs, the relationship between data in a machine and the concepts it represents is defined
arbitrarily by the programmer. It is argued here that the Strong AI hypothesis suggests that no such arbitrariness is
possible in the relationship between brain states and mental experiences, and that this may place surprising
limitations on the possible variety of mental experiences.
Possible psychology experiments are sketched which aim to falsify the Strong AI hypothesis by indicating that these
limits can be exceeded. It is concluded that although
such experiments might be valuable, they are unlikely to succeed in this aim.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Birmingham, UK |
| Publisher | Aston University |
| Publication status | Unpublished - 1992 |
Keywords
- computer programs
- data
- Strong AI
- brain states
- mental experience